From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20325: convert "fixes:debbugs:123" in log to (Bug#123) in ChangeLog Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:06:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <0opp77menv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5530AC62.2010209@cs.ucla.edu> <5530ED9C.4010703@yandex.ru> <55312479.1060209@cs.ucla.edu> <55312773.1080307@yandex.ru> <33237A23-C3B2-40FD-9BC2-B43FEE51A2E7@swipnet.se> <55313513.4070704@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429290442 13837 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2015 17:07:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20325@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 17 19:07:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9jR-0000Jz-QA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:07:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9jR-0007Ud-31 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9jN-0007UY-Km for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9jK-0005ME-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9jK-0005MA-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9jJ-0005by-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20325-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20325.142929038421519 (code B ref 20325); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20325) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2015 17:06:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9ih-0005b1-NC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:06:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailfe06.swip.net ([212.247.154.161]:51642 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9if-0005am-8t for 20325@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:06:22 -0400 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 586504467; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:06:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55313513.4070704@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101642 Archived-At: Hi. > 17 apr 2015 kl. 18:30 skrev Dmitry Gutov : >=20 > On 04/17/2015 07:20 PM, Jan D. wrote: >=20 >> What about a few years from now when we switch to something other = than debbugs? >=20 > That's exactly the situation where having used debbugs:1234 until that = point will show its benefits. >=20 > > Why hardcode a specific bug reporting tool as the recommendation? >=20 > Will all bugs be migrated to the new bug reporting tool? Will they = keep their identifiers? Probably not. Why does that matter? >=20 > Unless you're 100% sure about that, explicitly documenting which bug = tracker the bugs are reported in is a useful information. We probably can remember the date we change bug tracker, so its not = rocket sience to keep track of what bug tracker bugs are in. We are talking about what people should write in vc-log. If you tell = them to write Bug#XXXX that recommendation is generic. What actually = goes into the git log is another matter. Jan D.