From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=99=BD=E4=BA=95=E5=BD=B0?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26638: 25.2; Fatal error 6: Abortmake[1]: *** [Makefile:737: bootstrap-emacs] Abort (core dumped) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:03:23 +0900 Message-ID: References: <59a9c203-815c-2336-d65a-463ac1316f97@cs.ucla.edu> <18198414-5ED9-4B88-B941-A4D95A1BE54B@gmail.com> <83val1z3ht.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4E779494-EEE9-49FB-BED9-9C949EB98B3D" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1504357478 10777 195.159.176.226 (2 Sep 2017 13:04:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 13:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Akira Shirai , Paul Eggert , 26638@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 15:04:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do85y-0001vF-PH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:04:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46024 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do865-0001qd-ST for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:04:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do85o-0001nZ-R1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do85j-0000hU-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do85j-0000hM-No for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do85j-0002D4-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:04:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=99=BD=E4=BA=95=E5=BD=B0?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 13:04:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26638 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 26638-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26638.15043574178443 (code B ref 26638); Sat, 02 Sep 2017 13:04:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26638) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 13:03:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41780 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do85I-0002C7-Uw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:34893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do85G-0002Bs-Op for 26638@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 63so7524995pgc.2 for <26638@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=vMjrGRLcrMvAsFM2bR2fwjb2m9/BTugLYpHcdDR5iiU=; b=b2LXfgIKvrrGKaXiW+dwrj4ePlbu3SDpZa5wtbHLPnPWoMwNCVR4Aw7nxOcYQJwNAj 6pvJTVJiAbF6sHjJx1cD0NB6HG5jXlAfHKzj6z/8f42KPQsRb0p65KsjNmTCVWUOTYrm bTRu0w3JYFlVCCUhEnojmznAqTgXsfFnQU2vS619EGmH7U+tKSLF1UYIgqO8/xTHsb35 nEs62EWCUbWykLjloJIN/QXsv4ziegvNFm7ij45UHwLmqt1SOB+1lhgTW3K3pUKhby+1 j15l+QmthriJicy70sSOZEX/BtfS3Ny72Cl/cjc9+0ZssgjtSbHvgHaXl0B1ymu0m6tY ml/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=vMjrGRLcrMvAsFM2bR2fwjb2m9/BTugLYpHcdDR5iiU=; b=gkr3AUD6OMzlJzO7y1uuTBTCqSgwUBpTfpLJgJZJ1QDZELAyCm0fGFXHdJavf3JLxp tKfLzQwSFwy9l5tR3A/Pjqh1aapmGLV8te15FkZ6CJWjPVg09d8z9I5wwggnF/unvBtP efnsyLFyhQlWARtpWgv9CnA/DlioSq6YtvBVPxvUMkF4UY9GkM/ZQ2uyZFsPzfxlDDiL 4Zv5H3dug2FKvFP/X87It1XvaqqeTi8ITDRd5ybFt5nXVgAlrvhbZQP6Q0OsKnwwcafU Rxqs5q1PIgw0wegtEgvuCJmK/J2x4135cofzFv/r4jBQ3Bi/+j7UiAqhEK+FWVIfz0nc vPpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgAWMn9tFGDu2VLigCHr5pww8gJatfcEXIqW0N4ukEn76G0lEzt glmDadN05akE1A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb52lsxQxdeJPjce7ibq4brEPNKPTxMp3eLZMu0es2kEGigWSAQJyEcTNeLU7QFi3sjaQwLExA== X-Received: by 10.99.7.68 with SMTP id 65mr5893350pgh.390.1504357408837; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [172.20.10.3] (pw126253006253.6.panda-world.ne.jp. [126.253.6.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j16sm3914866pga.81.2017.09.02.06.03.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83val1z3ht.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136476 Archived-At: --Apple-Mail=_4E779494-EEE9-49FB-BED9-9C949EB98B3D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, I'm sorry that I can not report any news on this one, except I've downloaded Sun C 5.14 (Oracle Developer Studio 12.5) but I've not installed the compiler on my site yet. I agree that it isn't right to block the release of Emacs 26.1 due to this problem. Thanks. > 2017/09/02 21:31=E3=80=81Eli Zaretskii =E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3= =83=BC=E3=83=AB: >=20 > unblock 24655 by 26638 > thanks >=20 >> From: Paul Eggert > >> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:21:49 -0700 >> Cc: 26638@debbugs.gnu.org >>=20 >> For what it's worth I could not reproduce the problem on = i386-pc-solaris2.11=20 >> with Sun C 5.12. Emacs did not crash at all. >>=20 >> My guess is that it's a bug in how unexec works in your environment. = It's also=20 >> possible that it's a bug in your C compiler, though I think this less = likely.=20 >> Unfortunately, it is hard to debug this sort of thing without access = to the=20 >> failing system. >>=20 >> Is it easy for you to try the latest C compiler from Oracle instead? = The current=20 >> stable version is Sun C 5.14 (Oracle Developer Studio 12.5), which = you can get here: >>=20 >> https://www.oracle.com/tools/developerstudio/index.html = >=20 > Any news on this one? >=20 > In any case, given the time since the last communication, and no > similar reports from anyone else, it doesn't seem right to block the > release of Emacs 26.1 due to this problem. >=20 > Thanks. --Apple-Mail=_4E779494-EEE9-49FB-BED9-9C949EB98B3D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Hello,

I'm sorry that I can not report any = news on this one, except I've
downloaded Sun C 5.14 = (Oracle Developer Studio 12.5) but I've not
installed= the compiler on my site yet.  I agree that it isn't right = to
block the release of Emacs 26.1 due to this = problem.

Thanks.

2017/09/02 21:31=E3=80=81Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>=E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB:
=
unblock 24655 by 26638
thanks

From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr = 2017 12:21:49 -0700
Cc: 26638@debbugs.gnu.org

For = what it's worth I could not reproduce the problem on = i386-pc-solaris2.11 
with Sun C 5.12. Emacs did not crash at all.

My guess is that it's a bug in how unexec works in your = environment. It's also 
possible = that it's a bug in your C compiler, though I think this less = likely. 
Unfortunately, it is hard to debug this sort of thing without = access to the 
failing system.

Is it easy for = you to try the latest C compiler from Oracle instead? The current 
stable = version is Sun C 5.14 (Oracle Developer Studio 12.5), which you can get = here:

https://www.oracle.com/tools/developerstudio/index.html

Any news on this one?
In any case, given the time since the last = communication, and no
similar reports from anyone = else, it doesn't seem right to block the
release of Emacs 26.1 due to = this problem.

Thanks.

= --Apple-Mail=_4E779494-EEE9-49FB-BED9-9C949EB98B3D--