&#160;<br />
&#62; There are other ways of doing that, but if you really need it for such<br />
&#62; a rare use case, there&#39;s nothing wrong in reading the code.<br />
<br />
OK, I only opened this bug, because I though it was an oversight in the manual,<br />
but if it&#39;s intentional, and the list is not considered as part of the public api then<br />
this bug can be closed.