From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41338: Toolbar-bug in Emacs 27.0.91/Pretest Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 16:12:38 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87ftbzva1f.fsf@rub.de> <877dxb4hzh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878shrey7h.fsf@gmx.net> <874ksfexjr.fsf@gmx.net> <87wo5aemyc.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="45844"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: 41338@debbugs.gnu.org, konrad.podczeck@univie.ac.at, juri@linkov.net To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 15:14:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ7L-000Bq1-SW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 15:14:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ7K-0003xZ-VQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ7C-0003uw-Iy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ7C-0007O2-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ7C-0007Hv-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 13:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41338 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: martin rudalics , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Juri Linkov , 41338@debbugs.gnu.org, Konrad Podczeck Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.158972118827932 (code B ref -1); Sun, 17 May 2020 13:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2020 13:13:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42583 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ6J-0007GR-Ic for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ6I-0007GK-7K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ6I-0003bR-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ6E-0007H3-FM; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.12.226.120] (port=57397 helo=[10.159.73.135]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jaJ5v-0005FW-Rg; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:13:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wo5aemyc.fsf@gmx.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180459 Archived-At: On May 17, 2020 3:59:55 PM GMT+03:00, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2020 15:36:10 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > > On May 17, 2020 12:11:04 PM GMT+03:00, Stephen Berman > wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 May 2020 10:56:50 +0200 Stephen Berman > >> wrote: > >>=20 > >> > On Sun, 17 May 2020 10:20:55 +0200 martin rudalics > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >>> But I don't know why the =E2=80=98delete-frame=E2=80=99 event is = not fired on > >> frame deletion=2E > >> >> > >> >> How do you delete the frame? You don't get a 'delete-frame' > event > >> when > >> >> you delete a frame via C-x 5 0 or C-x 5 1=2E > >> >> > >> >> martin > >> > > >> > In my test I followed the OP's recipe: > >> > > >> >> (7) Using the mouse, close the frame showing mouse=2Eel, but do so > in > >> a state > >> >> where still isearch overlays show up=2E > >> > > >> > I=2Ee=2E, I clicked on the 'X' (close frame button) in the frame's > title > >> > bar=2E > >>=20 > >> But when I close the frame with `C-x 5 0' instead and then proceed > >> with > >> the OP's recipe, the tool bar does not change and when I switch to > the > >> buffer where isearch had been invoked, the search is now abandoned, > >> i=2Ee=2E, no isearch tool bar or lighter, no overlays=2E So only clo= sing > >> the > >> frame by clicking the close frame button with the mouse induces the > >> surprising behavior=2E > >>=20 > >> Steve Berman > > > > Could someone please explain to me what is deemed to be the bug > here? Because > > I'm confused wrt what is the part of the original description that > seems to be > > the problem=2E In particular, the Isearch overlays are per-window, > AFAIK=2E >=20 > The bug reported in the OP (the unexpected tool bar change) seems to > be > triggered by isearch (it was part of the OP's recipe and I haven't > been > able to reproduce it without using isearch), but maybe the observation > about isearch I reported in my followup is a separate bug or perhaps > no > bug, even though it surprised me=2E >=20 > Steve Berman So the problem is that the toolbar is not reconfigured to reflect the fact= that we are in Isearch? Does it make sense to remain in Isearch in tbis scenario? Could it be tha= t we are over-engineering this stuff?