From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recenter video Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:41:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocf24xi6.fsf@engster.org> <87k4pq4tel.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277253701 24151 80.91.229.12 (23 Jun 2010 00:41:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:41:41 +0000 (UTC) To: David Engster , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs-Devel devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 23 02:41:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORE26-0004Pa-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:41:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORE25-0001oB-W7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44315 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORE1z-0001mc-7N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORE1x-0008Km-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:41:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:60332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORE1x-0008Ki-Kt; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:41:29 -0400 Original-Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so4214894gyg.0 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=1DXNxh5lbsPYngY+MTLvr7vLvyogZvpC/v0WDYdcxtY=; b=pLENYsH1vyYCObX4Gfw2dK0Okc1c2/hUOF5snGpRz/QpR+okac5nBMTsJUQQbwEQcj LrrGQZgo0EM6UsenA9nWReCqiajkHJ30+V7wiLNHc5PH7TBcTMExd0JhonksrvhITr2H EFvfuKNDt1Fmv1rEnRCC42x4es71rTRKWQtJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=qsFXcQRApMml+634dSl/OZ6lLLqB024Htc93d9FbOVnqaI0+NhhF3RxRjXmxzoU5GO I31Nf7Lyy7ejLaem3zji/smIvUsTN9Q2DWkSWqQfUawuuOzR8yGtE0FqCiVzglV5bv6/ MZo0TBEQB9hrJyW91qijepbJU/Xe0c+93miPU= Original-Received: by 10.101.105.4 with SMTP id h4mr5859986anm.33.1277253688251; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:41:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4pq4tel.fsf@engster.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126329 Archived-At: 2010/6/23 David Engster : > Lennart Borgman writes: >> Could you please send me the file you are testing with so I can see if >> this happens here with my patch? (It takes me a bit longer to send you >> the patch since I have a lot of patches.) > > Sure. Have fun with my old diploma thesis. ;-) Hi Eli and David, I have now tested with the file you sent me, David. (It scrolls so slow I can nearly read it though my German is nearly non-existent now.) I can see the "jumping scrolling", but the bug here is not the same as the one I have tried to fix. Here I can see it enters the "clear_glyph" path in try_scrolling and I think this is what Eli have been working on. I have not merged in Eli's changes yet, but now I think I can do that since it is now clear we have been looking at two different reasons for the jumping scrolling. I do not think Eli's changes cure the problem I have seen (but I am not sure) and my changes alone can't cure your problem (but it cured the problem I saw when scrolling window.c). Just to sum things up: We also still have what I called the bug around 702 in window.c. For me this was a good step forward. Thanks for sending the file. - L