From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:31:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocfcj7r4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <87vd9j5neu.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <83r5k6isdq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276724416 2284 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2010 21:40:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david@harpegolden.net, storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org, no-spam@cua.dk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 16 23:40:14 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP0LF-0004nx-1E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:40:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38768 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OP0LD-0002Zv-TC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34825 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OP0JC-0007M9-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP0JB-0003rF-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:62707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OP0JB-0003r9-CO; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so5224220gyg.0 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:38:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bqmci3MYDT3bau+3geuxHm9ysPdrLudTC+2pRPvwfHU=; b=rWZg0k7Y7nRLrL1kefuxT3VUePUcvQwM4Pd3qjqRp9b3N9XET6azziuO6CAE5qg3rC jWesNs49sl9aZzVM/75cYtOfV+JJHUgwpTUe3gWEduaZBxdysUwOnNH8mxT3jrK1FSzK hRjsi5n3YMiHa4SxEa4UL8gtMNXin40un6Vm8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w+jN2Xg5ln0JrqDdynHrzh8GwKDglgzr3j58b0OEL8TPj7t/ODsxk7g1e4zPOChTIx XW3kWEusLIy4jYOcLL5R5Dwmau+D320kSlrtGZ3NrrMCYi/DhkR97XNSzAkZwNzlLOmu ppCAZRvx5vyOOSAPiF/5sn70Y59e+C3z0yvng= Original-Received: by 10.101.5.18 with SMTP id h18mr7907176ani.120.1276723894102; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:31:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r5k6isdq.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126040 Archived-At: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:35:53 +0200 >> Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 David De La Harpe Golden >> >> redisplay_window checks this somewhere around line 14500 where the >> comment says "Try to scroll by specified few lines". If clip_changed >> is set then the if arg will be 0 and the "jumping scrolling" will >> happen. At least that is how I understand it at the moment. > > Oh, and btw, does the same problem happens in Emacs 23.2? I am not sure, but I think so since I always have been irritated by it. And I have hardly touched Emacs 23.2 so I do not know, but maybe someone else can test.