From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wojciech Meyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add rainbow-mode Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 17:49:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1280235011-12761-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> <87zkx8nb9e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hk9gjhp.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280767782 10437 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2010 16:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Niels Giesen To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 02 18:49:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfyCp-0007I0-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:49:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfyCo-0002Ev-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:49:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59392 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfyCg-0002Bo-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfyCf-0002RO-73 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:51256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfyCf-0002RI-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so1894369qyk.0 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WKg4AyWeSzQWKRfqSNvvE2xc6Hjbb3+tRRSxM/DrqWI=; b=N6edyR5NknFG4JMip3Rl73XnmBDwTr9rU99EsPj0iXV+IGIEavWeIg5fJBGZnnX8wf A1QlombdtiqgIE064HODWeCS+3DWFix93j+DK69kuLYlSEJJTSj2D47XDD+qbtuK0+nr 40n1OLAVQxbFf9BDSOZzF8DsDFZEJrXtCvsHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=o9vVOkfP0zzj2Run3ukHY9LhIZPvrA1PvMQu17NCiLSRZYIPDQh2AxktMVgUIXMixp wMqIjkVD7Mhm6lQuX+52NTEpXFDtSXqrw9+HeVvEmquuSi6nagkOJoArr338GPHjEhTM 7Ncb36t/lZgsrM/dt9snua2sbtkbGvL4xzbV4= Original-Received: by 10.229.240.145 with SMTP id la17mr286519qcb.75.1280767768290; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.96.73 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128134 Archived-At: wrote: > 2010/8/2 Ted Zlatanov : >> >> LB> I do not think rainbow-mode has all the functionality in >> LB> css-color-mode (but I only glanced at rainbow-mode so I am not quite >> LB> sure). Are you really sure of this? >> >> I agree it doesn't have all the CSS-specific functionality. Is there >> something specific you need? > > I would be glad to get Niels comments on this. I do not think there is > much that is very css-specific. (For example the conversion between > different color notations could be useful in other places). I have seen HSV and HSL conversions, pluss css-color-mode works in every mode. The name is a bit specific only. > >> rainbow-mode.el is more generally useful and can support the >> CSS-specific code, whereas css-color-mode.el can't support tex-mode for >> instance. > > I am surprised to read that, but then perhaps functionality from the > both minor modes should be merged? Yes, I think it should be. Wojciech