From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 23:08:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874p9954u9.fsf@escher.local.home> <87typyei05.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3wmr4dn.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <9A67516A216749079A10805DBCAD67D1@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274648935 18147 80.91.229.12 (23 May 2010 21:08:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 21:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 23:08:54 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGIPk-00020B-24 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 23:08:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43107 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGIPj-0002Uj-G8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 17:08:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56969 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGIPd-0002TD-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 17:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGIPb-0002pO-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 17:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:35034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGIPb-0002pK-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 17:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1833498gyg.0 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:08:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dhBsIti9Q+G1vpGF4UcxxkL8xXSF2BEK08GTYsUsMQA=; b=vJEZgWvM7vfh+0QAr9GsNvyDVIoCJ82I+ronpStjFviroQiJGD5zP12/nMmHwjm1j9 ohRzJ4Gu1wktIfB62/oEZLdgfpNfU5lzVerWRr94kdFyYajIZb0jllb9nrBnGBT9oQM1 8q+oxLZ8BklwcLBva3jVYxwwBvrh7wj1zCmFQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=odwxn7RCC8vNsfPtUpLuoL4/eiyj6s5IAAt+/T5IszOExWlgA4bgWTUxscWcPHEWOl j1QanKtzUu4V809KnFpTk3rKpTYICT4ueEZ+uWs0u3cwAO/YD9LXfbbjrOvnUMSxn83x kVBORvt6XVFYvOVpf7dERudB26XKukrHmmRRc= Original-Received: by 10.100.246.26 with SMTP id t26mr5563225anh.112.1274648923269; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125152 Archived-At: On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >> > I do not believe that C-x is "reserved for Emacs". >> > Nor should it be. >> >> So you answer boils down to this. >> >> Let us clear this out. I think C-x should be mentioned and that it is >> normally reserved for Emacs use (including cua-mode of course). You >> think the opposite. >> >> Whether it is reserved or not I think the status of it should >> be mentioned. > > So even if it is not reserved, that non-reserved status should be mentioned? Yes, since it is an important key. It clashes with CUA and it is used very frequently in Emacs. > Would you do the same for all non-reserved prefix keys? > For all non-reserved keys, prefix or not? ... > If George Carlin had taken that approach we wouldn't have the 7 dirty words. > We'd have an exhaustive treatise on all of the non-dirty words. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_dirty_words Merriam Webster?