From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Differences between ibuffer and dired Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:27:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871vbmnaxk.fsf@escher.home> <38165C775CE64A828DB8008B087373F7@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278026919 3694 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2010 23:28:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 23:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Deniz Dogan To: Drew Adams , Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 02 01:28:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUTBL-0005xa-5B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:28:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36323 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUTBK-0001mO-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:28:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50664 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUTB9-0001m9-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUTB4-0005Cf-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:56204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUTB4-0005CW-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1072639ewy.0 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:28:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+DQsJL0ipSZBH+3H6romO9Y5hJczaTmczCERGwF4Bco=; b=KaJHoAF/2x1eHQc3JqmwndSibrSaA1ZlrPf9OUFZqZJr9ev7bh6pt6BSW+sdkiuVPC zUcXs7dkqkRN2Q8/e+B9O+Ha8By9Yh8tQyOuMJnDKhcOAO/ozdYGdcELa47XF+fFJpMd HDHm8Eawt8VADXRsC8/gz8yMmYytkPRMGlv3w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NXV9Sisw3zGq0jLGL7Dar23Qk0n9Ux1KT1cQZCl3+GcoKdtT7h5rsrG/EwYxLsxmML 3Uz2uwtvTsU/7C7qD8NXa5lI81seUZfVLtHNeQaOPK7kkiG5EF/qAGuSyapIpVjq6gDo bw+DX9qHD0RkqcWJayx4gM9uO/587vwrFsQGA= Original-Received: by 10.213.4.207 with SMTP id 15mr3294349ebs.63.1278026897263; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.15.132 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:27:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <38165C775CE64A828DB8008B087373F7@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126663 Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >> > =C2=A0 ;;; ibuffer.el --- operate on buffers like dired >> >> All the more reason for these to eventually take place! :) > > And all the more reason to figure that the Ibuffer designers were conscio= us of > whatever differences (inconsistencies) they introduced. > > Not a proof, of course. =C2=A0But the fact that Dired was partly the insp= iration > suggests that they were well aware of Dired's design, its UI, and its key > bindings. =C2=A0Which suggests that in the cases where they choose differ= ent bindings > they might well have had good reasons. > > But perhaps Colin or John will speak up and set things straight. While we are looking at this: Wasn't there a discussion before about putting ibuffer on C-x C-b? I don't remember, someone had something to say about this. Was it Juri?