From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:10:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280723901 16855 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2010 04:38:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org To: Christoph Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 02 06:38:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofmn0-00034A-QO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 06:38:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ofmmz-0007t1-W4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49540 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ofmmn-0007rh-9e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofmml-0002ev-2u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofmml-0002er-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:37:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmMf-0000G8-RR; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.1280722225984 (code B ref 6736); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 04:10:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmM5-0000Fp-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmM4-0000Fj-1r for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so3426227iwn.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:10:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RbI2vdzTP6qj7qC6hg9+851MnGcT1K9Wc1ZQGkFZ8x0=; b=VxZtmaOc8TwfyB7bncUzQmiRO8/xmWROJUm/+QWmNx6pd16GwdGo2A1K9LcvVQAMBJ 7QJVGcnQlCqfLXou3jT9DtYQyHrHhUFepinK1MjRaPXLaNmYKVKfZ3K+bGFSzphUGxXv plrqong0QRE8LONyNiH2XS5Qt83aQnsft0TAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DAT4twXfTWm3+sdhk+KPdjk12E7WiCk43ttwC2Rf1rqpc2ZFZV7c4DMzTD70ntIFaH dL+nywwDLA4rEVYcfW3tpzgKTI0lfwkB3omL0ons9pXBkPcZSpvqHa6Icmch3Hcj0vKe i99BXES235Hp4DskhSPKou1VCrBoMhklI2y+w= Original-Received: by 10.231.149.207 with SMTP id u15mr6575562ibv.13.1280722246222; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.162.4 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:10:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:11:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39133 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 05:58, Christoph wrote: > Right. I guess I will rephrase the question: is there ever a situation wh= ere > we SHOULD delete the site-lisp directory, specifically with `make > maintainer-clean'? Should? I don't think so. Could? If you can determine that it has nothing of value. But I don't think it's worth the trouble. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma