From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6460: Documentation `define-key's DEF arg does not provide description of the `remap' feature Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:13:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mxuqj3x4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277011749 13560 80.91.229.12 (20 Jun 2010 05:29:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 05:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6460@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 20 07:29:06 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQD5Z-000802-QU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 07:29:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQD5Z-0002a6-4P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:29:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59494 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQD5O-0002Ya-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:28:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQD5N-00005i-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQD5N-00005e-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQCr3-0006Jb-La; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: MON KEY Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 05:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6460 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6460-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6460.127701080124268 (code B ref 6460); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 05:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6460) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2010 05:13:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQCqN-0006JN-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:13:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQCqM-0006JI-Od for 6460@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: by yxt3 with SMTP id 3so14727yxt.3 for <6460@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.239.20 with SMTP id m20mr2831110ybh.407.1277010795095; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.10.5 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:13:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mxuqj3x4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: aUw8PTs_v21f6Ke7OoWj0gwh044 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:14:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37898 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Chong Yidong wrote: > I've tweaked the documentation to reflect this, thanks. (I think you > are confused, though; key remapping occurs in the KEY argument.) Yes, of course. You are correct DEF is def. not the relevant arg. ;) Was juggling three concurrent/related bug reports. I apologize for my mis-statement. -- /s_P\