From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr smart server [was Re: Locks on the Bzr repository] Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:56:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282323426 10345 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2010 16:57:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jan.h.d@swipnet.se, Andreas Schwab , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 18:57:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmUts-0004Kf-7E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:57:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43813 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmUtr-00033N-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60543 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmUtm-00031k-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmUtl-0001Jz-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:56:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:36986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmUtl-0001Jt-M8; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:56:57 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so646780qyk.0 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLyr504ihz/myFvEFJaMC+XkcdtSlGRwuS55OTdY8yw=; b=CMqMNhckCVpK2YreVp44aOo2YTIoH4pXsJCMO815UHzDGsQYoS9D/ggT1pC2PyThIU LnFWBpOiqHZsCvF9VfgHEWiquIoLPIYYEU68CYzwaa8Z/lCPYEUDdptCp0DSveR5cqRD rZcM6webr0OTDTkgZIFNyAfG1FJP7ewuN9prE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qkaCsgx4nx0doHCJz7uyKPNsVUDM0ib3SH0Pzu24p8lCROCK9sNkWgpe9vmcDj5LEJ UQqROaKRBDLro4DGjq0gU7zakQ1G+6/OwUcr09wNNmStEQhSOIK0YrM+dLbGwHi8BUoP S15eHYFf9J77WLshPKfVjwoqInLKxlDUu57hM= Original-Received: by 10.229.246.194 with SMTP id lz2mr1268957qcb.216.1282323416156; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.54.80 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:56:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128930 Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Worst of all, no progress is being reported regarding turning on >> bzr+ssh on savannah. =C2=A0It's been 9 months since work on this was >> supposed to have been started, enough time to deliver a baby, and I >> have no idea when (or if) this will happen. =C2=A0Could those "in the kn= ow" >> please tell what is holding this back? =C2=A0Given the information about >> the difficulties, maybe someone, whose connection is not so fast and >> whose motivation is therefore high, could help. > > I have no inside knowledge, but I like to depress myself by following > the thread on the Savannah mailing list. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers-public/2010-07/msg0000= 8.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers-public/2010-08/msg0000= 1.html It looks like there are real reasons behind the slow migration to bzr+ssh according to the link Sylvain gave: http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/Bzr