From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fren Zeee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:13:44 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87fwyy261p.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20100801.140650.297219757.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <87bp9lto70.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8739uwtlzh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87y6cmbuku.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281039240 15154 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2010 20:14:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 05 22:13:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh6p7-0007sz-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:13:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50316 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh6p6-0008EB-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36777 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh6p1-0008Dw-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh6p0-00063J-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:57840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh6p0-000636-74; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so564840iwn.0 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:13:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gjJxfJmTYQwpQ9GlIdq8DWYefcviGxDGgbadd5VwUaU=; b=CChGCh5QGZ3hvj50gsxfrzp/Sup1oVuQn4uWH0Qym6TQnIPxqEA/YdJ3BSX5NJMprV i27ZjajN7gs8/a5UpHB0Iofl4/ATONhJOmWgxkj4Cq92GCVS4tHSbwxAj9hDvEML8P8H lN2Pvte/HQmfAYfYUDmEyVJZHGol3pZDqH/LI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uNNT6qAUb8hGV+CGECuHbOqGfYzEv01bIVJifaA6wva1aley0XLpGKUqiZwP7yBrDv UDEl1f42UyEFYij+ZRBFfsZn0NYmFmLN+x16We9aSLirWb9CzCsYpIxUsL1JdQG8cR0q agV3lO7N5j1AsBYwV9Kz6qdoSOopQHjeeceso= Original-Received: by 10.231.157.143 with SMTP id b15mr12585572ibx.113.1281039224936; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.199.80 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y6cmbuku.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128321 Archived-At: I dont think it takes very much time to generate the typescript on the plan that he suggested, any more than the time to do it. All it appears is the absence of intention. I did not ask personal walk-thru. I asked him to give a typescript based on the plan he suggested for knowing the architecture. On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:22 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Fren Zeee writes: > >> Show me [...] >> >> Give [...] >> >> OK, so give me [...] > > If you want personalized walk-throughs, I suggest that you find somebody > willing to tutor you for appropriate recompensation. > > This mailing list is not a programming course. =A0It may provide help > where your efforts of working with the existing material fall short, but > the person responsible for getting you up to scratch is you, and nobody > else. > > -- > David Kastrup > > >