From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6283: doc/lispref/searching.texi reference to octal code `0377' correct? Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:16 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274983070 32524 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2010 17:57:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) To: 6283@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 27 19:57:49 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhL2-0002ii-N9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 19:57:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41679 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHhL1-0006U5-Q5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55176 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHhKp-0006Pv-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:57:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhKn-0001wM-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHhKn-0001wI-P8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHgtC-0005MI-An; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: MON KEY Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6283 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127498130920589 (code B ref -1); Thu, 27 May 2010 17:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2010 17:28:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHgse-0005M2-5P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHgsd-0005Lw-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:53999) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OHgsY-0003Ny-LO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57443 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHgsW-0002zl-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHgsV-0005LR-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:54676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHgsV-0005Kr-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2010 13:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so240363gwb.0 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.172.6 with SMTP id u6mr416464ybe.298.1274981296281; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.143.21 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 10:28:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7TkVGeJN5m-IBW5VaxfuGppyfrs X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:29:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37335 Archived-At: In doc/lispref/searching.texi is the following reference to octal code `0377' correct? ,---- | You cannot always match all non-@acronym{ASCII} characters with the | regular expression @code{"[\200-\377]"}. This works when searching a | unibyte buffer or string (@pxref{Text Representations}), but not in a | multibyte buffer or string, because many non-@acronym{ASCII} | characters have codes above octal 0377. {....} `---- :FILE doc/lispref/searching.texi (info "(elisp)Regexp Special") Shouldn't that be: "characters have codes above octal #o377" -- /s_P\