From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Efforts to attract more users? Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:43:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278805462 14513 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2010 23:44:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "fplemma@gmail.com" , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , "rms@gnu.org" , "joakim@verona.se" , christian.lynbech@tieto.com To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 11 01:44:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXjiU-0005Pq-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:44:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35661 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXjiT-0007cR-Er for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53838 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXjiN-0007c9-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXjiM-0006pM-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:49745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXjiL-0006p5-NV; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2256618bwz.0 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4TcnQkdQZMs8+MOrtQpD0hoWVnAgzjzXpoPRUuonWSQ=; b=QHcgwhvJfmEhDyv8F2gSWjWdNFwjoIVkv+qdAm1/i5SLMwoa62kHMSUlDeqp2eD/iL oj/qQW0/6HHTCoeL9cwx2nz2kKjb5cupoYPKoV21tORSmOOE/VoRo3sEXZszEjGWKRva uLGHHPNwhadJm19Ok58zlKe07sdxzUNWvVFzY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JAEu+yZbgFSTthewhMdWA0wAivDF8jaQkWRjE02OpP/qp3JbG8V89UUH91jARaPGVF iQltmOjn4ADMJse+QHy/dRQvae9Fw4L7rQ1ppt6+G/4zip937w10RfxZA4HvLPG4nnea NK1h8LVnBA4xyGffWiZGT+9nfpofrn4SFG4MA= Original-Received: by 10.204.2.139 with SMTP id 11mr8754398bkj.202.1278805443169; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.53.204 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:43:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127015 Archived-At: On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 02:28, Lennart Borgman wrote: > I told you at that time how to do the merge. You seemed to believe it > could be done another way. Yes, you told me "here's my code, please adapt it to the trunk, as I don't have time to do it myself" (not exact quote, but that's the feeling). > Maybe you are right, but to me the way you > wanted to do it looked like much more work. I ran out of time. No, what I wanted was not more work. It was the same amount of work, but mostly done by you, instead of me. > I have told some times now that I am not interested in keeping the > patches. I have thrown away some because I do not have time for all > the merging. That does not mean that you haven't forked, only that you don't have the time to maintain it. > I do not accuse you of anything. I didn't say "me". > Take for example the recent discussion about the display engine. There > was too many misunderstandings so in the end I thought it was best to > just drop it. I remember the discussion. I got the feeling the misunderstandings were mainly on your part. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma