From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 02:26:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCA9E5D.5060002@swipnet.se> <838w1h6zbp.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCB2713.5070104@swipnet.se> <4CCBC930.5060705@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288575819 29861 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2010 01:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 02:43:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCjQt-0006og-31 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 02:43:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCjQs-0004em-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41461 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCjQh-0004ea-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:43:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCjQc-0006Sy-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCjQb-0006R3-Sc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCj6z-0005iV-Kw; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.128857456921968 (code B ref 7296); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2010 01:22:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCj6m-0005iH-DY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCj6k-0005iC-TR for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so2948716gxk.3 for <7296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=4lfbUxKWIpmYnILVQOflGf8u0epK4tcWMA4wYGQNUUc=; b=pR/yCT2spdrvHXsQhvubCOWXPPGki7Blv/p8u9qQ4PWJtRjlz2NcWn21LH+BRPSZmB 7jPe3kZWDWQG2HVnuhB+2idXrmntAfB/7cxRsOQk7e6WRacg65BWykx9YQ4qQNn+4UBT tTqvM3TnFs6Nd7j8zwztUxWRcCurjepwRq1II= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=LFB2sdJLoq/DDYQTRauaQ5Nl9l1oll2BGP/4SJuXPE1jaCqtAFOuBk3zhu2wYtLgCN DEMaC0oGZW8bP3YoacoF5HhJlSXu28bPV7fJ7K2st6jhK+hpL0fd5cat8ITLL5WV9W10 OPdsuG5SDHIogBKH9S90OeDQNdfIc2CWTTxfE= Original-Received: by 10.229.224.67 with SMTP id in3mr6653227qcb.236.1288574825127; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.224.199 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:26:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:23:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41320 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:56 AM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:24:55 +0100, Lennart Borgman said: > >> Could we, as a first step, do as Eli suggested, i.e. let >> display-pixel-height/width return the working area size instead of >> the total display size? Is there any reason not to do this now? > > I'd rather suggest implementing "some of window manager emulations" > (i.e., shortening width/height if specified one exceeds available one, > and possibly maximized, fullwidth, and fullheight for the fullscreen > frame parameter) on W32 and seeing if the proposed function is still > necessary, before introducing incompatibility or new primitives. In what way can the working display area size in pixels be incompatible? And why is using the current total display area size better (and more compatible)? And how do you plan to implement the shortening without knowing what the limits are?