From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbf795rv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290543405 17440 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 20:16:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 21:16:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKzI6-0000Qz-F8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:16:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKzI5-0007gU-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:16:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54475 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKyyg-0007YB-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:56:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyyf-0006Fz-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:56:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:59857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyyf-0006Fn-8d; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:56:33 -0500 Original-Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so10097807eyd.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:56:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FX5tzRpFXmA62MuCN/T6SbNf+W3ZRma3VGu9p6iRQI8=; b=xxz9ymsZFrRTyzfFPOLkHVcjes2xrHwNbTqbq5lqC/CKIw88F3paVmL/H4LIrSpiZy rGFpPUmAnBn84O+If504b9wq2wdat1EQVqmz7+JvhE3jmpsi0dcwRNawZ2A6MvPTfno+ r9Lbqx7LGECS73ixC6SmZc19NxGu2nuX6CKyE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j03nnRht0HC6nnGahnjfPSHhlss/RR5T1noitlSeTYf0E0j7mbP4PFQ9/4s/x0UzsW GNlTcIn1Ioxn+hcgnUDuDy8BLUUzVpAa2bHHZafQj7/uOwdoIbzR8fL6IxuZO1wDCjAA ql6KqNT7T/Za6Woa1gOKeuK3bfQBSH//tj8Ms= Original-Received: by 10.213.112.144 with SMTP id w16mr4261039ebp.84.1290542192095; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:56:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.34.199 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:56:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83hbf795rv.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133079 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:28:33 +0100 >> Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: Lennart Borgman >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100 >> >> Cc: Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >> >> >> =C2=A0- Releases should or should not include debug info? >> >> > >> >> > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug info. >> >> >> >> Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and without de= bug info? >> > >> > Because it's pointless. =C2=A0If we want to give users release binarie= s >> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period. >> >> Please explain why you think that. > > I just did, above. In what way is "pointless" an explanation?