From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows binaries - trunk or release branch or both? Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:15:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83tyg1vdh7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298032254 3756 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2011 12:30:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 18 13:30:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqPU1-0007r5-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:30:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqPFb-0001Vi-Er for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:15:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39126 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqPFU-0001VC-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqPFT-0000l3-6q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:15:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]:42513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqPFR-0000jy-Kv; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:15:45 -0500 Original-Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1792131eya.34 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:15:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bO0XYbwoSdKb/FZLmUOgwJYHabKZpZRAJcw0vJ8E3n0=; b=tcfthxiO4rn3mjrVSVn9ItWy+f2d7+E//AL5TnnmXITkhjeOzfb1uPANrO5p2Uz6Eh YETBLkpDpYkSJcLAdINxJDqeACknFnxqd176wBt7IPqdwQ8QST91TpGR98afyfDTFCh5 8Vc3MpaS17Eht0GKRB47e/EZtyoQQmcPxIF0U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xApHI9xQl1Im9WcX9EOZZDJ+x9LAEDjDrdaxmXfbk0xQ7sq1ZD3Tw1BckJo2+Bwjtb BFxKroXqZbjd2YdfbsrC3YnZQ5NW6JA7WprSkjjv4Jtx/LivSCeDBkw1CzMsYsdJn+0P HQPAbMztVAjV/T5CNJrzx2HKq/QLn7xTNZ2gg= Original-Received: by 10.213.34.1 with SMTP id j1mr79178ebd.68.1298031343116; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:15:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.29.212 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:15:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83tyg1vdh7.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136179 Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:04:19 +0100 >> Cc: >> >> Hi Sean, >> >> I just got a question whether I had some new windows binaries for the >> trunk. I have, but I do not upload them any more since I believe you >> do that. >> >> However I can't find information about that. Do you upload binaries >> from the trunk or the release branch or both? > > I'm not Sean, but I know the answer: both trunk and branch binaries > are available. =C2=A0The former in http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows= /, > the latter in http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/. Thanks. >> Where is the information about this? > > Sean posts here when he uploads a new build. Yes, I know, but I still did not know where to find this information (except searching the mail archive). Shouldn't we put that info somewhere?