From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:33:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbf795rv.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwur933c.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3pv92az.fsf@gnu.org> <83aakz91t2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290548035 7945 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 21:33:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 22:33:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0Um-000369-0J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:33:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33221 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL0Ul-0000bZ-AV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34757 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL0UZ-0000b5-S4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0UR-0000um-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:33:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:33700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0UQ-0000uV-Dp; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:33:26 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so6508609ewy.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:33:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=II6hEhCRVX0etc2M3vgJx4sU6ZdIzpLZQ9ER2FCOHPU=; b=HChtZTndI/e0XWp31TtqHcwQ9Ot/OsG7YDu29phBNHa7+j51brQ6x9jy8l7MBUg6kb jJZ5JICKXvIlOW4DwdSqoAH3wTBR34yz8djm9Y+2aH3UZkUbtIgt+GIR8dOQreBp2dZR EP+lCujV1xJHTbX+IWSrRg6fbCICJZvvgQqYs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Utkz23DRjY0smB04WU074CMeYsthpQxgU5d/JhtzKDFILU1ZzVST1MHkLWUJknMNRw 7QvvpbnBtxEs05HZmxkeCyZLP+v1yYfXbCA45nKR8huhsN6y1T56Y3//jceaqCghxHA2 anyXIXNspngo+8XbJEIQlF1WOObuAZaZ7mcoI= Original-Received: by 10.213.14.79 with SMTP id f15mr7610689eba.58.1290548005233; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:33:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.34.199 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:33:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83aakz91t2.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133089 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:10:59 +0100 >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: Lennart Borgman >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:39 +0100 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> From: Lennart Borgman >> >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100 >> >> >> Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Because it's pointless. =C2=A0If we want to give users releas= e binaries >> >> >> >> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please explain why you think that. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I just did, above. >> >> >> >> >> >> In what way is "pointless" an explanation? >> >> > >> >> > I meant the second sentence. >> >> >> >> Can you then explain if you think there is any reason not to ship the >> >> release binaries with debug info? >> > >> > I said it is slightly better, that's all. =C2=A0The reason is disk spa= ce, >> > of course: 30MB is a lot for a binary. >> >> Why do you then think it is pointless to ship both binaries with debug >> info and without it? > > It should be clear: it's even more disk space waste. Why do you think that giving the users the choice to download either binaries with debug info or without it is "even more disk space waste"?