From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bernardo Barros Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: base Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:43:49 -0300 Message-ID: References: <20100822120642.GA1794@muc.de> <87bp8uzu9d.fsf@mithlond.arda> <871v9o7dmf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wrrg5rzg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r5ho5gyr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hbij6hib.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874oejq4zn.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de> <87fwy35n11.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87bp8r5b99.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <877hje6dcl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymimuif.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp8qfn3r.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282769044 22333 80.91.229.12 (25 Aug 2010 20:44:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 22:44:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoMpE-0006JU-2s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:44:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoMpD-0006ic-6J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:43:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34472 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoMp7-0006iN-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:43:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoMp5-0002o8-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:61042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoMp5-0002nz-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so1229354vws.0 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:43:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ssDYz1K2V/9pjVsHlXBjuj9RSz93luBG+Tzb5xlERhg=; b=rH5B7w2Fc+OBWRPUd+ouhDSUiK+63wTmlRc2CvSIiox0budeGToUnKtSLc3Jj6Ttdn pvupXiDJQIVPpXg6cgG3yTrCrW5RlCLIk2FKWcdhI0x91FXGmHMcaMXrHdT+P07Wkx4K MG6dZv7Ut47T9Yr7vNEahdOPEmYGYpbEnqX0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kyP0tOiX85Aem1iJaBNNQOXCyjZZs2So36/M1BWrrv/rARAMX4XrP/K0wE1U2fpXln QnbM938hwvLYK15gsvKFM+1Cug8rM6xwlLsbAk7GX/8OXHkXWGrMFSFU8raSUd7+bFeS +qUwaHzxTAuPo7hWRARQKfPqAVawRZFrLNUNs= Original-Received: by 10.220.62.72 with SMTP id w8mr5575879vch.61.1282769030279; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.190.69 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:43:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bp8qfn3r.fsf@telefonica.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129229 Archived-At: Is rebase *that* important? Mercurial has rebase and it's also made with python, does not have issues with windows as fas as I know 2010/8/25 =C3=93scar Fuentes : > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> Sometimes, and sometimes not. =C2=A0Like Bazaar. =C2=A0It appears that = many >>> Windows users have great difficulty getting SSH connections to work >>> right. >> >> I use SSH from Windows for many years, both to log into GNU machines >> and with CVS, and now with Bazaar. =C2=A0I never had any problems >> whatsoever with PuTTY. =C2=A0So I cannot understand how this could be a >> problem, and a blocking one at that. > > bzr does not use PuTTY (plink, to be more precise) by default. > > I had problems with bzr & ssh too and had to learn about the existence > of the environment variable BZR_SSH to fix them. > > >