From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 03:28:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <176EDAD3B9E54E39870FA3F84A5DDF3C@us.oracle.com> <19542.56658.583000.394397@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.30901.687000.971249@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.47167.15000.439215@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <4C5B5C39.9090104@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281058156 5381 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2010 01:29:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 01:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 06 03:29:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhBkI-0003UX-QD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:29:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43115 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OhBkI-00032b-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41674 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OhBkD-00030r-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhBkC-0005Mp-Ep for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:36125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhBkC-0005Mi-Ar; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so5881535qyk.0 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:29:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SGIhuKgaYe2h8LgmETvxvIF1ThM7WjD5jgfk3fijkz8=; b=OzzTJpNg2bma2scaR2krQLWs9MKqnIxuYm4tkZQwj6HQoh8V61QRXSxAhv3UxV95AZ vyMB6vIfRtcLfgHNwik4Yjn6GvjyIW2sQAdKFBhelfRWZIFbJMEw4Z7hTYMNFn2ycQGd fvf1vxVX0+dZZxAcwT5gx21+ktThNHgUu0MEI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dLRpF1emLr5nPXuGMFYUwi4mg5KUXqORe/YMHH7Q/8Pu1XM7BQddK6Yb57uB8jbiwf GF6JyaULsXT4SY5rFVsW76pmswuSmKc8qXxX5Y8A+9NQiX0PPVLDPbs3ms05D6npMwTM UgZord2quZn2TSAb9hpP9+q0nUufobZntv74I= Original-Received: by 10.229.239.3 with SMTP id ku3mr3025893qcb.129.1281058147146; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.9.84 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:28:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C5B5C39.9090104@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128334 Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Jason Rumney wrote: > On 05/08/2010 21:22, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> You can not override Alt-TAB so that you can use it to switch w32 >> windows is because ms has decided it to work that way. >> > > When I search the web for information about Low Level Keyboard Hooks, abo= ut > 80% of the results are about using them to override Alt-TAB behaviour. = =C2=A0I > find it curious that you claim this cannot be done as part of your > justification for moving Meta from Alt to the Windows key, when your > solution involves what would be the solution to the Alt-TAB problem. That is interesting. Something might have changed since I did this - after all some years has passed and MS are now and then changing these things. Can you please give some links?