From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: base Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:48:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100822120642.GA1794@muc.de> <87bp8uzu9d.fsf@mithlond.arda> <871v9o7dmf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wrrg5rzg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r5ho5gyr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hbij6hib.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k4nf7ezq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282693789 3729 80.91.229.12 (24 Aug 2010 23:49:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 01:49:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo3FT-0005F9-EW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:49:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54510 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oo3FS-0001Nd-Pd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44522 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oo3FN-0001MX-0g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo3FL-0007BO-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:49:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:59580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oo3FK-0007Ay-9Q; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:49:38 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so26219iwn.0 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:49:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5dmwgdJFmmOTAyhYf7rL/fJ2W7PeJHoCaVw4x4/ekB4=; b=HD0VU8gLkQCp0O059nGQYcLO4w03/Oo8FyCyjnjt+eOyrgvoWq66s+NKgNj51LhuVP enaJp7HqZqrCmzL21GmzSvdMDE3UQg1Q1I5U5nTKMkVTWy9ohCUmWNhXLjI+mo5yS+4o B5/RpAD0tHMQX6KcKqqZL7z534uAdizzRD+MA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t4w6w0JZELJ/rS+SPMhsmrSBYMZF7K+A1ecgSX6KrX/8izIshrRgS78226Ovo06Tka UXhq6icx256nXiUspNUQ2/A6dWIMowsLic9/0YQxaOnMxL8yyktr7KPWl97KOI674k72 AoT6vXcU/Az93AwTTIvsha2Ri48oybXR4DVI8= Original-Received: by 10.231.194.219 with SMTP id dz27mr8790708ibb.104.1282693777485; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.151.132 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:48:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4nf7ezq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129181 Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:44, Miles Bader wrote: > This is all very silly, because however bad git's UI may be, bzr's > seems far worse I don't think it is worse (not by a long shot), though I do agree it is not good. But that's hardly an argument in favor of git's UI. > -- this is perhaps most evident in the constant and > continuing confusion over even basic usage of bzr on this list > ... after how many months of Emacs using bzr...? IMO that's more related to imprecise documentation that bad UI. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma