From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6468: A couple of problem related to frame raising (partly w32) Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:32:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276981141 14811 80.91.229.12 (19 Jun 2010 20:59:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6468@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 19 22:58:59 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ57z-0006Ue-81 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:58:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQ57y-0006zJ-H1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:58:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50621 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQ57r-0006yO-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:58:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ57p-0003AN-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ57p-0003AI-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ4is-0002Df-8A; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6468 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6468-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6468.12769795668524 (code B ref 6468); Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6468) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2010 20:32:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ4ib-0002DQ-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.211.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ4iZ-0002DL-Oo for 6468@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:32:44 -0400 Original-Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so2392461ywh.0 for <6468@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QhS1MHe1efyws/WHI9GNx+HGiAmRBQgt1RYJ2cOT2X4=; b=WJ6vT49m7PLGoZwWCo6RZ+Sqz/OhzCmmuXba0Ipj3Q8iHjOBI0DSRGIVWjDwWPNt4r o8sdYwSDfFGiKhsiHTXt4HrfSt0IeSr8+emTKfoxUxYvxdWynxSZZUvYiZSFI9OE4ujh HdAk2C/STYI67ma2Owsvq6RtHjWn4nWesP9zU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SkPAwNBCgucRxCifLQdrVlnNLgKZ9llwn7xgLAsoPqGRKgQNAxg6gdE3hnahyrBgwf cGjJibVAjEX1HUYCvJlvcBxeZAIUF+aWuIHLZByhZmu4sSvPTYc6EOq+8QlLsjaMli3H R+/M2yTXVnYx6zJuf76RywiU3fiVe2fImxIjo= Original-Received: by 10.101.203.9 with SMTP id f9mr2386157anq.208.1276979559132; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:32:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:33:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37887 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrot= e: > > You seem to think that other people on these discusions have all the > time of the world. Often, if you gave all the details, as precise as > possible, from the beginning, everyone involved (including yourself) > would save time. I often do not have them. It is mostly not that kind of problem I am report= ing. > If you propose a change and it is not accepted > because the interested parties do not understand what problem you're > experiencing or cannot reproduce it because you have not provided > detail enough to convince them that there is indeed a problem and your > fix is sound... well, then, who's wasting who's time? Some problems, like the "jumping scrolling" seems hard to understand though I have given all logically necessary details. What do you want me to do then? >> However if you want to comment on the bad nesting here I would be >> glad. Do I misread it? > > I cannot comment. I don't see a reproducible recipe and a clear > description in your report. I have no recipe. I asked about the code. Was that unclear in some way? Please explain why then. I am asking about this part: foreground_window =3D GetForegroundWindow (); foreground_thread =3D GetWindowThreadProcessId (foreground_window, N= ULL); if (!foreground_window || foreground_thread =3D=3D GetCurrentThreadId () Does not the if clause mean that if foreground_wind is not 0 then the old value of foreground_thread will be erased? Or am I misreading this? > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Juanma >