From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6871: Please make linum-mode per buffer, not per major mode Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:57:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282255754 19981 80.91.229.12 (19 Aug 2010 22:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6871@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 00:09:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmDIM-0005Sd-Vz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:09:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmDIM-0007AY-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47009 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmDIE-00079I-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmDIC-0002me-Vk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmDIC-0002ma-UE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:09:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmD6d-0002LX-08; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:57:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6871.12822549858992 (code B ref 6871); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2010 21:56:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmD60-0002Kz-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmD5y-0002Kt-TP for 6871@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:56:23 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so2079853iwn.3 for <6871@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:57:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G4KEpNivsBlROKp661JH3lUG2gvUOMa/l6tPOfhJRrY=; b=KNMR8ODIAtBos7mxJle2kEXF7QzkuSXURDSWO98guHbRcu5DTiQjU2lcr9HVTS5wNB 79zOpjKalGb0yoXcuhFIp47i0cbEqO4YoR3SIbPoUeyI/xv3VERmToCBlCE/7TBqvKY4 CUj15UjoGpJ0IJBMNUxSE7Bh2NOP0RoerGYe0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=auQ5hKT5QWvlfMPWgdmxxEKwxV4nk/ktnuRv+h3FK9o4PP2UWcX5FQWn1HzlYjITP+ 61TwdwMhNEvV/4Nu8EfRnmB9kF1UqT6zGfruKjsFJdmdeXs8JnIp/M/6FfJlc/hDOIuD E31QeZfQJgPe4ehuf0QmNA3PKD0perMywVtCc= Original-Received: by 10.231.147.202 with SMTP id m10mr528814ibv.2.1282255050388; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.151.132 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:57:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:57:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39648 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 23:23, Lennart Borgman wrote: > I thought the intent would be obvious in this small amount of code, > but it looks like I am wrong. Usually, changes are much clearer to the writer than to the reader :-) > Do you try to keep multiple copies of the code with different patches > in each? Or what do you do? That depends. I don't develop on the trunk, but a branch, so if some of the changes are trivial fixes or whatever, I move them to the trunk and commit them right now (so one less thing to think about) and keep the other changes in the branch while I refine them. Else, I commit each change to my branch as separate commits, and then, when the time comes to merge back to the trunk, I decide if they are related or not, so I push them as a merge or separate commits. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma