From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <176EDAD3B9E54E39870FA3F84A5DDF3C@us.oracle.com> <19542.56658.583000.394397@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280851411 20122 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2010 16:03:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uday S Reddy , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 03 18:03:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgJxa-0008GA-NZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:03:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgJxZ-0003pJ-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41102 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgJvW-0003Ct-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:01:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgJvV-0001Jy-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:60888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgJvV-0001Jk-H9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so3207430qyk.0 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KIuaMRquGalWTzueaWqJ7Af9pXHKj7N4Z71P2cNKkck=; b=BzRmq2vEHNiuOeq+NCcIQ7VoUbq/eIFme0OWE1daebsvktLuJOB6JvWuppnCDgwDze LCkAuzIGmcuBG6DxEd1jXL8cnHCYDW4wQDq8xZpe52DwnM9JsZE02brAoE9NWBangF7E 1BohzP9Gkbdo5E9iBLsUsd4Z82SSBqNOpJAi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=UajE9HMpOzyWWrxfmW9muOBqZxnK4xGHBZqXAm22Yc+t7TcCJiEe3OgXAgmtyfsrrP Ca9H+xolgHnmCBRvC+10ZHsO9vac2wuVaKQkx2V5fjOi9fHK8hskYKSQ+iAwjpr9dexG HRBgphtqs598qSUsTgpGCq6EqrYni7WBpbzMw= Original-Received: by 10.229.217.83 with SMTP id hl19mr1304391qcb.15.1280850904125; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 08:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.9.84 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128200 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:02, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> My intention has not been to fork (though you seemed to believe that, Juanma). > > No, I don't think that was your intention, though I think (and > apparently I'm not the only one) that's what you've done. I dislike > that, because it seems like a wasted effort. I'd rather see you > working on standard Emacs. Seems unlikely. I am working on the standard Emacs. Though that does not always pass this list. (I want to keep the discussions to a minimum.)