From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:57:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278064746 4217 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2010 09:59:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Davison , Eric Schulte , Emacs developers To: Carsten Dominik Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 02 11:59:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUd1S-0006aH-VO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:59:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41395 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUd1S-0000DG-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41250 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUd0c-00089y-S1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUd0b-0004fU-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:58:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:41233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUd0b-0004fN-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1216161ewy.0 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:58:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UWdz5/X2SugfuX1S1QTXQJf1NO4+m3BCrIzpFmlDITE=; b=ie3egxhkqkIVcMM6oEKnn1t67ItPYnNBV+alwzSTBMZMc3yhRd94gruq2zOjdg+W7E PPmGkeqVS7dOCSmNSMPGQ9GgchzpsP/XemADt5mTlQbgqshayYTBOJEpD3x8wIOyzKKv 4/1S+kMNbjyODy9pef9HmIHbPrEMe1qSPOAJk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OiCUIIR+vBzAaeGPF6O7H7KbHPbeUfsrJ7HgKJff2hxL4vQ7IauVoDOwEQVeOz2DIc BMo3Byi5fLOpVI+Ez0zxxWP+j03GqRlGslcD5DlPXKqmb4sD+DVNvMQay5wvpulA0EEL C79SKqpOHcdfUje7BAS1YaFJ/dJ/v9EFu84Es= Original-Received: by 10.213.6.208 with SMTP id a16mr3773688eba.95.1278064687123; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.15.132 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:57:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126690 Archived-At: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am on the verge to install a new version of Org mode into the Emacs tre= e. > This version includes org-babel, a system to work with source code > snippets embedded in files, for documentation purposes, but also > for evaluating them in a reproducible research way. > > For supporting different languages, we will have a few emacs lisp > files which should not be compiled because the have dependencies on > code that is not present in Emacs. =C2=A0I.e. they do something like > > =C2=A0 (require 'slime) > > and call lots of functions from this package. > > I think the best way it to leave these files > uncompiled. =C2=A0Is this acceptable? =C2=A0If yes, how do > I exclude them from compilation in the standard > Emacs build process. Why not use (require 'slime nil t)?