From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:35:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83aanyhrnz.fsf@gnu.org> <5n1v95koyt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837hiq5dh4.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp814l5x.fsf@gnu.org> <838w354f7i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284406580 9443 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2010 19:36:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 13 21:36:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvEp7-00056G-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:36:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54389 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvEp6-0000c6-RP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53440 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvEoz-0000b5-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvEoy-0000lk-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:49670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvEoy-0000fi-7A; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-iw0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 33so7752253iwn.0 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VPnjrs2KrkQB8pCdXtM7zwLsWQ73FsVp89SviqR5hTY=; b=vlI5hRW7LNXUiK19808rqpC7joi2s/aZDbNVIbC20OK7OlhsObkMhv9gViCEhvn+1h JEmrxdC4+9xPIHMiaxK+zq7/G/nBYG+jKOc9g8K0tYTMMv2jr0IbDyH+9A2lFEuMapzv NO12opEz0JjlNSglKkihRIX8qUh8en19e+us0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rEsi+S+36QRdwnU1Dk3KRmzCwDjm4sM6REeLW48hfg8XEvtQKwoXxzU+UoiHNPIkcM qSKFouppgLR9b+hpfJ0sG1yBcoXYN8yqinx5B67s79pkPGCLgox3WCbq566jSwldj13Y AZxSKjx4Aoq8XrrKM48WCBrx6Gztqwc3ah7m8= Original-Received: by 10.231.15.73 with SMTP id j9mr6434642iba.23.1284406567355; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.150.195 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:35:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838w354f7i.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130091 Archived-At: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 21:26, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > How does it do that? > > Ignoring dotfiles on Unix is not magic nor OS-level trick: an > application, such as `ls', must actively omit them from processing. > Where are they omitted during bootstrap's byte compilation? I don't know the Unix makefiles well enough, but I suppose they use the shell to gather the list of files to compile, and AFAIK, on Unix shells the expansion of *.el will not include dotfiles. On Windows we use for %%f in (. $(WINS)) do for %%g in (%%f/*.el) do \ and %f/*.el does include all .el files. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma