Re: Suggestion for epa-mail-mode

[ken manheimer <ken.manheimer@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2010-07-26 06:27 +0100, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> > Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >>> Since C-c C-c is currently bound to mail-send-and-exit, using C-c
> >>> C-c as prefix will be a significant change.  Do you have any other
> >>> key sequences in mind?
> >>
> >> I suspect this is a typo on Richard's side.  He probably meant `C-c
> >> C-e C-d', `C-c C-e C-v', etc.
> >
> > Aha, I see.  Thanks.  Done as r100904.
>
> I wonder if we should also make pgg obsolete. When I raised this issue
> over two years ago, this was the agreed plan. As far as I know, there's
> only one file in Emacs that uses pgg -- allout.el. Its author said he
> would find time to change to epg but nothing seems to have happened in
> the past few years.

i've looked at migrating from pgg to epg, but there are some
intricacies and i hadn't found the time.  i'll have an opportunity to
look at it again over the next month, and will try to make the
migration.

i also have a few change pending release (including making C-h as the
terminal part of an allout keybinding optional - default off), and
have to look at converting allout to use define-minor-mode. there's
another place where the intricacies i put into the allout minor mode
implementation are getting in the way, but i guess they warrant
clean-up.

i'll be working on it all in a few weeks, with priority on the pgg ->
epg migration.

> > Regards,
>
> Regards,
>
> Leo

--
ken
http://myriadicity.net

(ps - i don't keep up with emacs-devel, but do have an arrangement so
i'm alerted when allout is mentioned.)