From: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:19:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimGVYNwkq5Q1H0BgN8t8e3iLqzMvFhumausYFcm@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=DZGRe77OD1=TTO8747gwe1N50WFf6qdqPb_dn@mail.gmail.com>
2010/10/8 Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>:
> 2010/10/8 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:
>> Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2010/10/8 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:
>>>> Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> 2010/10/7 Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was discussed briefly a few years ago and Stefan (and other
>>>>>> people) agreed with it: how about we map ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
>>>>>> in Emacs-24?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ibuffer is a superset of list-buffers, and it provides many things
>>>>>> that list-buffers does not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If a significant majority of experienced Emacs users prefer to use
>>>>> ibuffer instead of list-buffers (which is what I believe) what is the
>>>>> problem with making this change?
>>>>
>>>> Thinking like a suitor rather than a programmer.
>>>>
>>>> Making a choice between two different feature sets that both have
>>>> deficiencies is the wrong thing to do if we can instead create a version
>>>> that does not contain the particular weaknesses of either.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Binding C-x C-b only changes a key binding.
>>
>> And marriage only changes a soul binding.
>>
>>> This has nothing to do with modifying list-buffers or ibuffer, neither
>>> does it affect anyone with the intentions of doing that.
>>
>> You propose a divorce from C-x C-b with list-buffers, and a remarriage
>> with ibuffer. Namely making a choice rather than an improvement to
>> either.
>>
>
> Don't dramatize the change of a key binding by comparing it to divorce
> and marriage.
>
> Nothing stops anyone from changing (or possibly even merging) ibuffer
> or buffer-menu if we change C-x C-b to ibuffer.
>
> It appears that this topic has been discussed back and forth for at
> least seven years already
In fact, I just found this from 2001:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2001-12/msg00546.html
So it seems that the intention back then was to obsolete buff-menu in
favor of ibuffer (and in doing so change C-x C-b to ibuffer, of
course). I'm not sure that this ever happened.
--
Deniz Dogan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-08 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 15:17 binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default Dan Nicolaescu
2010-10-07 15:46 ` Drew Adams
2010-10-07 20:54 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-10-08 0:29 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-08 0:34 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 0:46 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-08 0:51 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 1:32 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-10-08 1:38 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 2:26 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-10-08 2:33 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 3:16 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-10-08 6:48 ` David Kastrup
2010-10-08 13:53 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-08 13:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-10-08 14:06 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 14:09 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-08 16:45 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2010-10-08 1:43 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-08 7:57 ` Sergei Organov
2010-10-08 8:51 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-10-08 11:22 ` Sergei Organov
2010-10-09 4:02 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-09 14:51 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2010-10-09 15:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-08 0:57 ` Drew Adams
2010-10-08 1:30 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-08 2:57 ` Drew Adams
2010-10-08 1:03 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-10-08 1:34 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-08 9:12 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-10-09 4:01 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-07 23:29 ` Juri Linkov
2010-10-08 3:05 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2010-10-08 9:23 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-10-08 11:26 ` David Kastrup
2010-10-08 11:43 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-10-08 11:51 ` David Kastrup
2010-10-08 12:13 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-10-08 12:19 ` Deniz Dogan [this message]
2010-10-08 12:27 ` David Kastrup
2010-10-08 15:17 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-10-08 9:54 ` René Kyllingstad
2010-10-08 16:06 ` Drew Adams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-08 4:13 Roland Winkler
2010-10-08 8:27 ` Deniz Dogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimGVYNwkq5Q1H0BgN8t8e3iLqzMvFhumausYFcm@mail.gmail.com \
--to=deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.