From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290537622 20325 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 18:40:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 19:40:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKxmn-0007w8-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:40:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43240 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKxmn-000857-54 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:40:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42130 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKxmh-00084w-Lk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:40:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKxmg-0002XV-QD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:40:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:44636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKxmg-0002XH-Ld; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so9692028eyd.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:40:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a3t7hz0uddeTEHiwm5hShFgyEh+WIJXRSkQIgWwkQGY=; b=NAMpFjPp+SnSTQJE/lh7r3QIEZNG9oWZ5bmXpiRkNTn9JpKWcdrcxU4O3L6wSzekNN BkQy9wvddvVCgGeTuHwm45wqOU4R5pOc/SpJWunHejetPsL10fGfNpGsmSpqZjof09gV e9sGwhilHUdQvz4LXk99Dp2RjRexVS/WD0tag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OlaxjM+e0Pdnj8S3JGRVVhUE+dOOciEWQsPJ7RQBgfg1PnQq9pxwOzL3ETdaXW6IqP 62Dgw7fh1CFhOa36Q2YWvaOp3VVoazKuWbXHG2ccljwC6+8hZUElyT3gF7X9y2tNonCx Rl/tM4nd5Mhr57s1Hk2yILdgbd4bzEIk6qE7U= Original-Received: by 10.213.34.20 with SMTP id j20mr7270325ebd.71.1290537602128; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:40:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.34.199 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:39:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133072 Archived-At: >> =C2=A0- Releases should or should not include debug info? > > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug info. Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and without debug in= fo?