From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <176EDAD3B9E54E39870FA3F84A5DDF3C@us.oracle.com> <19542.56658.583000.394397@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87lj8nsndb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <19545.14451.62000.682223@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19545.19472.187000.199606@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19545.20656.500000.91025@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280925540 20615 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2010 12:39:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uday S Reddy , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , joakim@verona.se, Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 04 14:38:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgdFH-0006wC-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:38:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34559 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgcvV-00016b-47 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48026 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgcvN-000153-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgcvM-0002Ik-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:55581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgcvM-0002Id-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: by qwk4 with SMTP id 4so3368154qwk.0 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3lHOLQGx2rLe2XBNf5LV/gmD96dqmSccF6W/fFo4YJ4=; b=ic/E6emzlJiAf+f7pVJmcDjBqbuOkzYWpnJlGOW7GfhGx3r6A5W113xS1QzbPUYcLM xdai1hc3MCbydmsYQsq3q5xVPIOq1XD7NqUqaF0QmiaxMa0+fKcJUiAOztx8pWBXYFDP qv+z9Fp9pRNqeh5GGr9eCL5k6HBOlqoqp/Zkc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=BvJIJoMlOC4zOON3BM5k8q7eGBuzBTU8DgPVDt7bplKo/D/1FyjB8T37StsNLo0abU 97LYS4H9rJm/4SUw3qOTGbVcRKgh3zqQKfdhbOAmmTRMqHQMEZdIYQtJEZk52x86eV3x uMJIb06+t9fZx15fMZiTLGog9untf+b4SfhnA= Original-Received: by 10.229.181.210 with SMTP id bz18mr2300974qcb.43.1280924299129; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.9.84 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128235 Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> There is always a reason. Look for that. A lot of users thinks the >> current behavior in other applications is good and wants it. > > They only know what they are offered. That does not mean that they do not have a good reason to like it. And isn't there research behind this?