ob-lisp missing

ob-lisp missing

[Steve Hafner]

Why has ob-lisp.el been in the git tree since August, but it is not in
the stable release nor mentioned in the manual?

Anyway, thanks David and Eric for coding this.

Steve

Re: ob-lisp missing

[suvayu ali]

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Steve Hafner <steve.b.hafner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why has ob-lisp.el been in the git tree since August, but it is not in
> the stable release nor mentioned in the manual?

What do you mean by stable? If you mean Emacs 23.2, then it is because
it ships with Org-mode version 6.33x. If by stable you mean Emacs 24
HEAD, then it is already there.

Does that answer your question?

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.

Re: ob-lisp missing

[suvayu ali]

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Steve Hafner <steve.b.hafner@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday 24 December 2010 10:51 PM, Steve Hafner wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, I mean the current version 7.4 is missing ob-lisp.el.
>>>
>>
>> Are you sure you are looking at the right place?
>>
>> $ git ls-tree -tr HEAD | grep ob-lisp.el
>> 100644 blob 600b79ee7af93906b042ce9ad649ce3b97aedb5b    lisp/ob-lisp.el
>>
>
> Right, but http://orgmode.org/org-7.4.tar.gz has no lisp/ob-lisp.el
>

That is definitely a bug.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.

Re: ob-lisp missing

[Eric Schulte]

suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Steve Hafner <steve.b.hafner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday 24 December 2010 10:51 PM, Steve Hafner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I mean the current version 7.4 is missing ob-lisp.el.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you sure you are looking at the right place?
>>>
>>> $ git ls-tree -tr HEAD | grep ob-lisp.el
>>> 100644 blob 600b79ee7af93906b042ce9ad649ce3b97aedb5b    lisp/ob-lisp.el
>>>
>>
>> Right, but http://orgmode.org/org-7.4.tar.gz has no lisp/ob-lisp.el
>>
>
> That is definitely a bug.

This file *is* included in the repository, but was never added to the
Makefile, so it has not been in the tarball releases.  I've just added
this to the Makefile, so it should be included in future archive
releases.

Thanks for the notice -- Eric