From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:26:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83aanyhrnz.fsf@gnu.org> <5n1v95koyt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837hiq5dh4.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp814l5x.fsf@gnu.org> <838w354f7i.fsf@gnu.org> <8362y94egs.fsf@gnu.org> <834odt4cd4.fsf@gnu.org> <8339td4a47.fsf@gnu.org> <19lj75ibdz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zkvl2crg.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrqo2q1s.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbhq3k0x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284586050 14824 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2010 21:27:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , wojciech.meyer@googlemail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 23:27:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvzVj-00006r-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:27:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53526 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvzVj-0002OO-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35366 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvzVc-0002NN-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvzVb-0006bk-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:43148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvzVa-0006be-VE; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so714141qwf.0 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xoHOzoaIRMAoFYKpre3sjifL7uBsc9a6mvZMsDtCBUw=; b=QAKfuX2Pa5TeunO5t+B0RMpLdPrEkH0JzO4XM6YykEALyswS34nd8sbiGWN10Bxm7P 9aNgBlJVhuvMXT0A9yWgpXvt5P+k0A2c453JmsBCRrDjutXrKp1R6mrzMCOA6T3woWcj q3WqW5AJySWtXmijKCEx0L/s70RqTZvCFN+cs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pXvxw5upl36c5ysCGLabcUg/Vs6afz5VLj3rnO2EEPT1n34at489RvJBbLMHZP6jBS YEAYNQo4cMh03qGD2AyvMLFrMU1o3wjboa8eV4oPn6XXnaXs4T8njxPsmTESuTXWkGKO DVJyaj8FXD7CKLrym9aPJRqcxyj7wzsqTABBQ= Original-Received: by 10.224.104.4 with SMTP id m4mr1535337qao.76.1284586034133; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.105.68 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:26:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83hbhq3k0x.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130235 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Juanma Barranquero >> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:03:23 +0200 >> Cc: Wojciech Meyer , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:50, Stefan Monnier = wrote: >> >> Non-simple, I suppose we could try to add an IF to exclude dotfiles or >> somesuch, but it won't be pretty I think. > > I would object to even think about such a possibility, let alone get > it into the repository. =C2=A0All that to exclude a single file? Two files, "." and ".." if that matters. But I do not understand the objections. What does "pretty" have to do with if it is possible, quite simple and stable?