From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:59:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <87vd9j5neu.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <83sk4misf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq5hiiin.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0lihov.fsf@gnu.org> <838w6cixma.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6ech1oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocf8gx7e.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0jgxk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig3gspa.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpb7gp2g.fsf@gnu.org> <837hlvglvh.fsf@gnu.org> <834ogzglaj.fsf@gnu.org> <8339wjgg8w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6eagb7g.fsf@gnu.org> <83vd9eg9j1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5k2g1qa.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig1g21p.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaqpfu1m.fsf@gnu.org> <838w69f61l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277114446 13793 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2010 10:00:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 21 12:00:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQdnu-0006wu-3Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:00:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQdnt-000306-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:00:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58817 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQdnH-0002pF-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:59:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQdnG-0004qj-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:46780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQdnG-0004qO-9e; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:59:54 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1150966bwz.0 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:59:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=8qcufJm7jGjoUQ2pRAP94cqAOYF9NlUpr37mIFoiXPk=; b=F2GUDpxBw3UZFPAFL+sXKpHrD8gOV6qTfC6Iw2TQqZbFYQW2x/vrNSVutT9SUaeW0G i9eLtk4Ic4+8FhbrdR4cgaMbo63cYwS4sjPA5S4nOT58ugYQbSYNiMeUVbMxjtpYFj4P TiZl9+jNHFFjL8IivfnbPdMG0WYJCNF5xrF7g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=oH6alEJVug1icBTU8dVIvLDDKwIaN56ig6Hc3mMF4U5rN650SvBNr4sGMv2ci+sIjG PZu6q3T2YCfNzLihEXfs1N/3nsKAJiHtNC5diGL9Vg58WwQ7ZKCT9ZCB3YNttrX9Cml5 fFWFjMiBDMPc9PEWy8ohYz+ZTFeOboOElZzD4= Original-Received: by 10.204.83.78 with SMTP id e14mr2694320bkl.136.1277114392133; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.24.129 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:59:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126293 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:31, Lennart Borgman wrote: > Juanma said that I should explain my patch more carefully to you. I > did, but I do not think I have seen any answer to that at all from > anyone. Mine was a general comment (and/or recommendation) about the process of sending patches up for discussion, trying to explain my *personal* view of why your proposed changes are sometimes overlooked (at least, from your point of view; I would substitute for "not well understood"). Eli is not bound by my requests, or anyone else's. So please stop saying "Juanma asked me to do X, I did and I got no answer from person P" (for values of P different of "Juanma"). Juanma