From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:39:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288298599 6086 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2010 20:43:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 28 22:43:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZJb-0001UU-HB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:43:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBZJa-00031x-CG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51659 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBZJT-00031r-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZJS-0003Xu-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZJR-0003Xp-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZCc-0004Mt-0y; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.128829814916783 (code B ref 7296); Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2010 20:35:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZCO-0004Me-Up for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZCN-0004MZ-6o for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:35:47 -0400 Original-Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so2361196qwb.3 for <7296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:39:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uypmu8xoO0VFgj9TFyeBR9EL0AupXVD9ur6ByJfb4YA=; b=l0e8L/TWiazcJqUcpAKEwVDq2jEqRhFs2xeY8clrP0UixeIP3ouZ2j9zI8MAdB5C1d qE0mWyqNhEIzZVkSlo9BmHHmM+cZC3bXaZ99a8os37GvtAFhMdpwIMRLmkvtopBDC2hD iBli1t5t0JYaM/p7+g7bO1B1cGQiAoBCGlJuQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Fc1LVbbNGtEn4elRI5vADEHTokFK3DwO8fPYD5+5VNKPdoSMc6rWySQawuAg6XRJB2 rf+HiF+5l2A4aTfbPgADGV7kr5cv2YBTDEKyQN2M4PyRKtogDPqZhULZai7O5PhUys5U ADPkM0rfrW7y2YePaYR/4ex97Nkllc3RpCu3U= Original-Received: by 10.224.190.3 with SMTP id dg3mr3291833qab.194.1288298396951; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.224.199 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:39:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:36:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41205 Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:11:07 +0200 >> Cc: >> >> I suggest adding something like display-available-pixel-height that >> gives the actual height available for a frame that can be totally >> visible. > > Wouldn't it make more sense for display-pixel-height/width to return > the height available for display? Probably. But there are perhaps also situation when you actually want to get the dimension of the whole display. Perhaps not at the moment, but with enhanced frame handling there could be. For the moment I think you suggestion is best. It will be more backward compatible than my initial suggestion.