From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83iq5hiiin.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0lihov.fsf@gnu.org> <838w6cixma.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6ech1oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocf8gx7e.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0jgxk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig3gspa.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpb7gp2g.fsf@gnu.org> <837hlvglvh.fsf@gnu.org> <834ogzglaj.fsf@gnu.org> <8339wjgg8w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6eagb7g.fsf@gnu.org> <4C1D24E3.5080402@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276979213 9717 80.91.229.12 (19 Jun 2010 20:26:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David De La Harpe Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 19 22:26:52 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ4cr-0003kg-6t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:26:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47605 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQ4co-0003hI-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46097 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQ4cd-0003fM-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ4cS-0007vx-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:26:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f192.google.com ([209.85.211.192]:39514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ4cS-0007vn-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: by ywh30 with SMTP id 30so2138651ywh.24 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rDEHzJQ78sMKryY88++PPhb0Z403FoIH/0Y7PC1m2Fc=; b=FIlPm4CAdqXwAwrNbhQCRcSFvB7f/olOd6arbzRHBOY5YE8z0OtVEBwI1jaINVK0uY PX6BW2Cmo3rQs3cqmDHoFPkopfrk3/3mggBwV+cjy4dQSRY5vED6ggL+gryLsriKPG6V M8H5G32urMZaqT/8mxHDwt2ErLbHSC6c0+2GM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=PQL5oF/MLi5tykRDdou7nEK+jplxOT3JSJLUo1HeqKES2RnekZ9uBIQzVNzrYSKkZ+ x2nCxPk16yi0h+/a5+ZsxFlO/dFipBLgE9RQc3aEztLIb72pr5Lommu8LdHQz5HeMO6/ 7Blg7GgrVa7HQxeGt1ctLUWNaVgESLHD0Qtqo= Original-Received: by 10.101.105.33 with SMTP id h33mr2374155anm.26.1276979184120; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:26:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C1D24E3.5080402@harpegolden.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126249 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:13 PM, David De La Harpe Golden wrote: > On 19/06/10 18:54, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> >> I would like you to try the above recipe in "emacs -Q", and tell me if >> you still see recentering. >> > > > Testing rev 100620: > > recentering still happening, though possibly less often (or my system is > just having a better day, I should have kept an old build about). > > I can still get it to happen easily by ramping up keyboard repeat rate, but > it happens quite often on HELLO even at reasonable rates. This is expected. The original problem is still only addressed in my patch. And that is not applied.