Re: How to change Viper-Mode behavior ?

[Alessandro Stamatto <astamatto@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1975 bytes --]

Alright, you guys convinced me! Im gonna get used to the usual keybinds.

I love emacs, but i read in some blogs about viper-mode for emacs and wanted
to experiment the modal keybinds.

Thanks for the answers and sorry to disturbing you guys.

Best Regards, Alessandro Stamatto.

2010/5/29 ahei <ahei0802@gmail.com>

> I agree this, and I want to know, why you want to use Viper mode? Delete
> text more conveniently. BTW viper-mode already support up down left right.
>
>
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Lennart Borgman <
> lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Alessandro Stamatto
>> <astamatto@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm using Viper-Mode in emacs. And i don't like the movement keys of
>> Vi... I
>> > would like to do those simple customizations in it:
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > change the movement keys to:   i -> up , j -> left, k -> down , l ->
>> right .
>> > change the 'Esc' key behavior to:  If in Command Mode change to Insert
>> Mode
>> > as if i had pressed the 'i' key.
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Is there an easy way to do those customizations?  If yes, how can i do
>> it?
>>
>>
>> I think those movement keys in vi where chosen to optimize speed.
>> Normally you rest your fingers on those keys (i.e h j k l).
>>
>> I don't think it takes long to get use to them.
>>
>> And there are other places outside Emacs where it is useful to know
>> those keys (I use some of it in gmail for example).
>>
>> Do you really want to change the keys?
>>
>> If you do then just look for the keymaps where they are bound. Maybe
>> some of it is hardcoded because the request to be able to move them is
>> quite weak.
>>
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2774 bytes --]