From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: buildbot setup (was: Bash scripts in black and white) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:39:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4BEBC372.5010402@alice.it> <4BEDBF5C.1040306@alice.it> <838w7lfzdo.fsf@gnu.org> <831vddfjp9.fsf@gnu.org> <4BEE984A.4090005@gmx.at> <87eihd143p.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <8739wcjosg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87eifo9y2j.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277923679 22775 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2010 18:47:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 30 20:47:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2KD-0002Bm-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:47:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42657 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU2KC-0002W4-Rs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:47:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36987 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU2K1-0002TO-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:47:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2K0-0007PF-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:57211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2Jz-0007On-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:47:44 -0400 Original-Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39so1297416wyb.0 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TrPC4n/ICB6dc7QToYjrvJJ3gS+jwRJ/Vni8JMSQOL8=; b=hvsIuaYWXRBZ4erShV5CxlNYwxt83lvd7Fh617mRvhzEuu0i2pyIwdIBbiZJ0d7UOm 7v4I1A67EESoQYhLBJAOgsj/oBR+5rvEI+vSZ1C+KJ+fufmyRGqZ2Q48Dgmf8RQNmoWz 0jsB4y7QHbXVMJErDLRV8tpa0Mnj/OeOYfiu0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OuA7LhdKYPI+uzNvb1hBVM+zDTF5UqN/kpXk8Xr1qc4nPalohpR93pNYAIVyypZeHG YYSNDPdODB7luRVdxS2o8CapVf5hXcue1rUECv7bgoATrAt4bWsid4BAEBXQrrxD0/Yz GACPHb5tjqjV2sYQocXPDdMwlR/WeqGbTRvRA= Original-Received: by 10.213.25.145 with SMTP id z17mr857182ebb.62.1277923183273; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.15.132 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:39:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eifo9y2j.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126546 Archived-At: 2010/6/30 Ted Zlatanov : > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:11:11 +0200 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > SM> So we could tell people to use to checkout the latest > SM> successfully tested version of the code. > > I'm not crazy about using a branch to announce a build success. =C2=A0Are Can't it be just a command to checkout the successfully successfully tested revision? > I think it's better and less confusing to simply announce failures > through another channel, perhaps as bugs. =C2=A0Then silence will be the > default, which is good for everyone, and builds will not have any > effect on the repository. Can't it be combined?