From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Window configurations Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:38:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4BB4CF6B.2000007@alice.it> <87vdb2qo82.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BE27C17.3030005@gmx.at> <87vdav4vx5.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BE900E7.3090402@gmx.at> <87r5liqv8f.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BEA74DC.2060103@gmx.at> <87y6fns8qo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BECF4D6.9030707@gmx.at> <87632na2af.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C03F1B5.8040708@gmx.at> <4C04D1BF.9070902@gmx.at> <87zkzcse1j.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C08B53C.7040304@gmx.at> <877hmezpvu.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C0A47BF.7010202@gmx.at> <87d3w5nuki.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C0B7AA6.2090400@gmx.at> <4C0CF6EB.8010705@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275932530 21531 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2010 17:42:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , martin rudalics , Emacs To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 07 19:42:09 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLgIp-0002rd-Dh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:42:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLgIQ-0000CY-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60454 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLgIA-0008Tn-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:39:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLgHs-0004U5-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:51381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLgHs-0004Tx-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so3038079gyg.0 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:38:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mgcoGao9tfGQNlVM5RN2IV2EM43x9lNwwvOcna9J3g4=; b=f3xA8PQli5AKz5hPaBYE08k0lK7zAge5HUi/thYXQcu2oerTLZMQ5vz/wx+peJUTCP VVv6XQr+tXDxbAAOTqo5MdMMpoG8JPuiu5Qo8gcMibGk4a8YCSGh/AxSZN4c4NMEZ7vq PD7hUjX9Lkk5tLbN0OakMQFnQWxLGLzRg3IXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K6g1/drzb2m/SJAGHviMSCHGCXqK6DMQKa39B8u7RVs4aPCZFTXJVqjYmBQtZsaYY5 sE8sFxwkjD30fG+fnscXKYwrSOr7f0NmBVl6SAeX9KFb85oD/eUaMtPM8yAaJuoTH/mj tnO9lbPu8HGiYUZqZ2EyhkJm0zpb6dlurXkfc= Original-Received: by 10.101.160.30 with SMTP id m30mr16304306ano.192.1275932338373; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125599 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Stefan Monnier w= rote: >> What I meant was that the current implementation gives very contrived >> semantics. > > I know. =C2=A0Maybe we should "fix it", as you implicitly suggested, by > simply always doing a set-buffer. =C2=A0It's fairly risky, kind of like > replacing every (save-excursion (set-buffer foo) bar) with > (with-current-buffer foo bar) ;-) Why is it risky? This is on the display level so to say and always associated with windows on the display. I think there will be no big surprises.