From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:48:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4C12383E.5030405@gmx.at> <4C133EBB.5090702@gmx.at> <4C148E0C.7000201@gmx.at> <7F2242DF262349D8A22BB9285AAADE85@us.oracle.com> <4C14EC69.5000608@gmx.at> <4C15191A.50009@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276451920 11467 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2010 17:58:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6385@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 19:58:37 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrS6-0005QC-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:58:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONrS5-0003Ye-M3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57651 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONrRz-0003YN-M1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrRy-00080M-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrRx-00080H-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrIs-0006Vi-29; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6385 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6385-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6385.127645134025018 (code B ref 6385); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6385) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2010 17:49:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrIp-0006VT-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:49:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrIo-0006VO-4q for 6385@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so2076762gwj.3 for <6385@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:48:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sUpjQyJPSnE3W41wXJ+UchQzlbhs/vNqB3larBF1J6Q=; b=JO3T9iNj2vsMh6uPapCs4IQ1ty3jkFcEbwRDBJiScHIiUs7H8pyYhdjObMvSzygf+Q rG1tL18S7fwm3H7SXWaNENINZlcT8HXiCQtS5NqV+hIV/hNdlWnWdA8XTjcHOwfFobbc d+dJS5eKD6KniTagXQxYXfphv9yG+LBU8QZro= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EarAz47h++oTf3KW6D3KwJ3iw3MqncyyTP7QS1xEqF4rmyfmfGT4LQ09fIWoZyvqIZ RFkVcs+75uj5KfcOBSK+c/09hcontOwwIUe5QSELTCFgsYKiqwThAP0nRzqdgoJ++mYy 5ms50VbFADAHewz4LnW65nFYNQjVjZg3xT2ws= Original-Received: by 10.101.11.20 with SMTP id o20mr3839241ani.4.1276451333179; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C15191A.50009@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:49:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37746 Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, martin rudalics wrote: >> I think it is very practical to be able to do let-bind >> window-min-height this way. I can look at the code of course and found >> out, but where is is possible deleting of small height windows done? > > With the first call to delete_window in enlarge_window. =C2=A0This delete= s > the argument window if its new size is less than `window-min-height'. > And size_window calls delete_window on any window whose size has become > too small when (virtually) resizing a parent window back to its original > size. Thanks. >> Is there a thought behind it or is it a bug? > > The thought behind it was probably that anyone who wants to enlarge a > window also accepts that other windows may get deleted in the process. > I suppose "collateral damage" has become the terminus technicus for such > behavior. ;-) Is there consensus that we should get rid of this kind deleting of windows with height less than window-min-height?