From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:59:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocfcj7r4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <87vd9j5neu.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <83sk4misf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq5hiiin.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0lihov.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276819222 19329 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2010 00:00:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 02:00:21 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPP0O-0005yg-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:00:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPP0N-0003MD-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40662 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPP0G-0003Jp-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPP0C-0005Lw-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.211.177]:56734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPP0C-0005Lq-Ag; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: by ywh7 with SMTP id 7so580268ywh.26 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=00PhtXJ2h5rIgGunDENGYd2SYKNTbMXhkK0H3bWRNuw=; b=f6yJyYwMEeiJJVH2sRh1rFYX6KSLdfYa2qnRAUzUlAXhJPKjsRWE/0aw9jrVI97lpn Ot+nGbS4N7wYg+9Gt0Q/xdT5bd3HLTGhGf0UjyrXWLZgm3H2HceSjEBL6QJR3Kc+jJJg tdwoTYnMxhx+TeK+0MwqWr4jMUfrxSpc6tFaE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=MFjLxqMyJ8YTy16gjiFO+UBZmvAojX/fnZ8qkzR5vFZMSWrlzvMafqcQvj7oy1FybW G4MS5hcxy1kRHX/fPgOqah84a6Cdqc3qYhyqPhM26KpulPNor8ViltrsnEAS/uHZHfh/ OJrVaL2zu3q168soUXg5PhpWPxjwKNdEuqglo= Original-Received: by 10.101.211.40 with SMTP id n40mr212385anq.174.1276819199152; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:59:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126114 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > > Playing with this I see some other bugs to. Which bug I see depends on > the window width. 55 gives this one, 54 another one where point jumps > instead. > > But I get no output in the message buffer or in the debugger telling > what went wrong. That is a bit strange. The 54 width bug was a bit different, it happens during C-l, when it should have positioned point at the bottom of the window. The old point is now below the window and points get "recentered". (Please when writing things like this put some output in the debugger about what goes wrong! The recentering here is done by some part of Emacs that discovers that point is below window bottom. Emacs should not just panic. After all it has its own psychologist.) For width 55 there is the bug I described before. For width 56 things seems to work better.