From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows binaries - trunk or release branch or both? Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:31:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83tyg1vdh7.fsf@gnu.org> <8762sh9c4y.fsf@gmail.com> <871v34al63.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298079144 29211 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2011 01:32:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Martin Stemplinger , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Sieger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 19 02:32:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbgJ-0001rT-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:32:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57785 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqbgJ-0002MJ-7T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:32:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49541 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqbgE-0002Ja-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbgD-0003if-Mk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:43494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqbgD-0003iT-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so205593ewy.0 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:32:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vJwwFAwLVtDklNBTEi8oI04+ye2GuyLiEi6eVKpG6H8=; b=YZoJx+7nGK/W5zq2QLSqYdNRXj+85aDSJP5Pt+FQt6T5ALaF2gTHRZIVO0+Oo+5mg+ orse+zIzswIakSZhuWvSVL3Ve/AEvukG9Z7/uthCS5O0/kDELJutjRtMnydRZIwuf1+L 0E9JfJz97+EBGCzKM3Lb1amcDcd2vdEq/yGBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VJ023FJsl7v7VsFcU0cMpRMrYtghUpROLhKp1+YBmSHHlK1WBR0twqyAg0fIQEoEIX X6ggmJer9W+x6ZM6HA/E3r+8xLTcOQ9RoqhzIZaZpolj1I1asdTXuOVstdCp00j3PVBE qggU6Qpv66QNgqDlgb6pVnOOshM1sWtQFuUtI= Original-Received: by 10.213.7.67 with SMTP id c3mr1705490ebc.68.1298079132124; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:32:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.29.212 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:31:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871v34al63.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136204 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Sean Sieger wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Yes, put I thought we should have an official note about it.= And if I > =C2=A0 =C2=A0put it on EmacsWiki I might not notice if you change somethi= ng so I > =C2=A0 =C2=A0think it is better you put it there. > > I'm not an official anything and I don't have anything to put there, > Lennart. =C2=A0I'm not sure I'd notice the change you refer to either, in > fact I don't even know what change you're talking about. Oh, it is no secret you are contributing time and effort to make this working ;-) Anyway I see that Martin Stemplinger has fixed the page I referred to now, thanks Martin. So it looks good now, but if you are changing the way things works it would be good if you changed that page too. (Doesn't this mean we (un?)officially depend on EmacsWiki for this now?)