From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:21:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <87vd9j5neu.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <83sk4misf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq5hiiin.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0lihov.fsf@gnu.org> <838w6cixma.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6ech1oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocf8gx7e.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0jgxk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig3gspa.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpb7gp2g.fsf@gnu.org> <837hlvglvh.fsf@gnu.org> <834ogzglaj.fsf@gnu.org> <8339wjgg8w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6eagb7g.fsf@gnu.org> <83vd9eg9j1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5k2g1qa.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig1g21p.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaqpfu1m.fsf@gnu.org> <838w69f61l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277119299 30260 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2010 11:21:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 21 13:21:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQf4J-0007uG-8I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:21:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39770 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQf4I-0006Rv-2N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57351 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQf4B-0006Rq-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:21:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQf4A-00008r-Cq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f192.google.com ([209.85.211.192]:37300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQf4A-00008i-AW; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:21:26 -0400 Original-Received: by ywh30 with SMTP id 30so2750462ywh.24 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:21:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=QmMpH2PG67wFlSl7iXPyzZpHHBCZHwG7v2eDKqAx54Q=; b=EoWcFGVAN1e11ctv1Cqunh2CZNoeumA74T4hSz0EzoaDicI2kKEOguagFV3Orxu7Zu x6y+4F3fyyccaNNBzRoty6oYGgHBKD5i2jvwEOAMelFpufYiOzlnXef/wAcCGSrRVVTf Myo0AO5JnVOrP6/YaNJUjA9yii+aSdQ5+z0+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=d78hTp7r5p1aAGPfAoGxLL2/YbdacbZVE+9mCPmo9BETLWRJUXaxcsYqp9M0GJYLQP 5rY2VPBgBZZeLXBE0XhJQRnD2NsNeqXYDA6V+Cr8dPNxMVur85G1tGdf52uFSU0EKbBg jOh+2DPffVAiziZ97LQiPHUAmiyY0JO2EnY1k= Original-Received: by 10.101.105.33 with SMTP id h33mr3747715anm.26.1277119282235; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:21:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126296 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:35, Lennart Borgman > wrote: > >> Sorry, I was not trying to imply that you did support my view. > > I am not talking about support. So how could I mention what you said? Or should I never mention it? >> I just followed your advice to see if it could help and noted the result. > > If you have already reached conclusions, perhaps you're going too fast. Yes, it is possible that I am going too fast. The possibilities for misunderstandings are very huge since we mostly do not know each other except for what we read and write here. We do not know much about each others situation. I glad for what we can achieve. Complexity is hard to handle within the limits we have, but even though I tend to think it is the biggest problem I also often forget it.