From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:40:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocfcj7r4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <83typ2isns.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxuuicjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83ljadikj1.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4pxijpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ocf9pi2x.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276803668 1392 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2010 19:41:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:41:08 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 17 21:41:06 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPKxR-0007PD-9P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:41:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41865 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPKxO-00020l-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36729 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPKxF-0001yC-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPKxC-0001Sz-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:37449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPKxC-0001Su-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: by yxf34 with SMTP id 34so5828yxf.0 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:40:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=wk8HNTl8bowoHU+W5038tMSfpC+e5j3TwiB/7IYVffk=; b=X6e5mu6MJzIE3At+NGwvQSzBbOEVvtTFOeXvb+SmY9oSzg/qPi/olvYpxSTBo969CI WyjKtxB1aDvPaLkycU1kA/0FCWj7SCugTHrlkhV6EcpS2L5033uecYEY7+ywgCjimXCF MjL5w+r1wflxP+CuUODnVSo24XeOvUYPa+4SY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=nCtbs4GFBSZDsXESGl3BO3pnSG486+CH4cQgSlTHiMcXWAx3rECYHNcNhpOFxKif/P egfUjssZszsnwMeR2fqfX6SIKi5MzgyLH4gO2l3XBmKUUIMvf7Y4fL/xyNEpDbxkJgsr CKNnB4Su+lTS7CEdIHCiS8RdNk88ENdLtBAho= Original-Received: by 10.100.244.38 with SMTP id r38mr28411anh.29.1276803645236; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ocf9pi2x.fsf@engster.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126095 Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:36 PM, David Engster wrote: > > Now this is just an example. As I've written, I've seen this behavior > for years, especially in large buffers when using different fonts, > elaborate font-locks, etc. I guess this is because font lock uses narrowing. See my explanation to Eli. You can try my patch if you want to, but please be aware of that there were one little part I forgot to fix before sending it.