From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scot Becker Subject: Could inline footnotes be made to work with latex commands that have arguments? Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:13:51 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1852848178==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36004 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OM7zp-0004Li-LK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:14:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OM7zo-0003uv-Jw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:14:13 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:39089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OM7zo-0003up-Hn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:14:12 -0400 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so4493983gyg.0 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:14:11 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-mode ml --===============1852848178== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e88c473371704888cf2f6 --0016361e88c473371704888cf2f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If I put a LaTeX citation command inside one of org's inline footnotes, no problem, thus: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,\footnote{\cite{rowe_acts_2007} } consectetur adipisicing elit, But if I need an optional argument, no dice. This: ex ea commodo consequat.[fn:: \cite[56]{fitzmyer_one_2007}] Duis aute irure dolor exports to LaTeX like this: ex ea commodo consequat.[fn:: \cite[56]{fitzmyer_one_2007}] Duis aute irure dolor (i.e. there is no \footnote{} macro created) For consistency in my markup, I would rather use org's inline footnotes for citations like this (which sometimes number several inside a footnote). If I can't, I'd just go ahead and use LaTeX \footnote{} macros right in my org files. Is the present behaviour likely to be fixable? Or should I just write my footnotes as LaTeX \footnotes{}? Scot --0016361e88c473371704888cf2f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If I put a LaTeX citation command inside one of org's inline footnotes,= no problem, thus:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,\footnote{\cite{rowe_a= cts_2007} } consectetur adipisicing elit,

But if I need an optional = argument, no dice.=A0 This:

=A0ex ea commodo consequat.[fn:: \cite[56]{fitzmyer_one_2007}] Duis aut= e irure dolor

exports to LaTeX like this:

ex ea commodo conse= quat.[fn:: \cite[56]{fitzmyer_one_2007}] Duis aute irure dolor

(i.e.= there is no \footnote{} macro created)

For consistency in my markup, I would rather use org's inline footn= otes for citations like this (which sometimes number several inside a footn= ote).=A0=A0 If I can't, I'd just go ahead and use LaTeX \footnote{}= macros right in my org files.

Is the present behaviour likely to be fixable?=A0 Or should I just writ= e my footnotes as LaTeX \footnotes{}?

Scot


--0016361e88c473371704888cf2f6-- --===============1852848178== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1852848178==--