From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Karl Berry: Re: Nick Dokos: texi2dvi egrep regexp
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:06:24 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikVGwLzqzfUpPMhPu8fE6Y8xLwTbDpSE2be37Jy@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17038.1286563867@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32860 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P4Qhw-0005ws-F4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:06:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1P4Qhv-0006an-2y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:06:52 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:61929)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1P4Qhu-0006Zp-V4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:06:51 -0400
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so591413wwd.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <17038.1286563867@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi everyone,

On 8 October 2010 11:51, Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
> FYI: Karl Berry's reply - afaict, it does not solve everything ( the
> regexp might mean different things in different locales), but is it
> good enough for its limited purpose (detecting drive letters)?
>

I have filed a bug report on the Fedora bugzilla[1] pointing to all
the relevant discussions about this issue. Feel free to add to/edit
it. Thanks everyone for narrowing this down. :)

> Nick
>

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641534

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.