From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Karl Berry: Re: Nick Dokos: texi2dvi egrep regexp Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:06:24 -0700 Message-ID: <AANLkTikVGwLzqzfUpPMhPu8fE6Y8xLwTbDpSE2be37Jy@mail.gmail.com> References: <17038.1286563867@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32860 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P4Qhw-0005ws-F4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:06:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1P4Qhv-0006an-2y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:06:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:61929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1P4Qhu-0006Zp-V4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:06:51 -0400 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so591413wwd.0 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:06:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17038.1286563867@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>, <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi everyone, On 8 October 2010 11:51, Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote: > FYI: Karl Berry's reply - afaict, it does not solve everything ( the > regexp might mean different things in different locales), but is it > good enough for its limited purpose (detecting drive letters)? > I have filed a bug report on the Fedora bugzilla[1] pointing to all the relevant discussions about this issue. Feel free to add to/edit it. Thanks everyone for narrowing this down. :) > Nick > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641534 -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.