From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102478: shr.el (shr-tag-color-check):Convert colors to hexadecimal with shr-color->hexadecimal. Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:30:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <961v6bom3j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87eiabdc04.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ipznhhe3.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87mxoz7mml.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874ob71y6v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4A76DA00C61D4637AC671E53FB7A4FCB@us.oracle.com> <87d3pvf5s2.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290612659 21873 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 15:30:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Julien Danjou , Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 24 16:30:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHJ6-0001No-UK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:30:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLHJ6-0004R5-9J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:30:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37955 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLHIv-0004P9-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:30:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHIn-00079t-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:30:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:54800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHIn-00079i-4p; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:30:33 -0500 Original-Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so16146215eyd.0 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:30:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1K5xX+j1HwgpaqpkyIQOdSxv/SyR2f8/w0fqvkabmGk=; b=TLj+IdAsz3Ft8ZBIUccQ3/xJNHy40RgXFXay3MygY62ceeq/UGyAbPlgxmS1Zfg5Iq l8J6X+G2C4Sc5FgaVsUrSg98LaZiW7FGeDYgXfztsy7G2hiyOON+ZmzWczyKHd7dBMQK h9ZWwDmo+gr1dvdJ8L9iLpte/WulOoNk6NWkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uQF4LdP7BLJuWFVsPjLdOTa8SPpfjjwqD7p5wOMnELbMuW+qxL0AyL92usDQMuzwbx lK70erfcspW4FNhts17SomvMtfL8oih/s1lwbWeiZwbP7ISW6Qq26G5in6UF807UyzM0 ADAO27/dBnHlIzF3ebxP1LYqQJ9KWHmAJUtrA= Original-Received: by 10.213.14.79 with SMTP id f15mr960887eba.58.1290612629924; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:30:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.34.199 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:30:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133118 Archived-At: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Perhaps we could all stop being apologetic and pointing fingers at one >> another, and see one important lesson to be learned here: that before >> adding a package to Emacs, the contributor should talk to the head >> maintainers about where the new package should be and whether it >> should be a new one or an addition to an existing one. > > Agreed. =C2=A0And the other side of the coin is that rather than complain > about a new package that not included the way we want it, we should > welcome the new addition and drool over the synergistic opportunity to > merge it with some other package [yes, maybe I'm pushing it a bit, but > I'm sure you see what I mean]. A problem is of course if gnus is including it to add a new possibility and that is not yet in Emacs. Maybe GELPA (or whatever it is called) could be a help in the transition.