From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Le Wang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: possible emacs bug, need help with repro Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:23:58 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87zkqi9lnl.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b40f6fb2ad3049b442d4d X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296617073 12243 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 03:24:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:24:33 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 04:24:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkTKV-0003IC-Ot for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:24:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkTKU-0001xW-AS for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:24:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52364 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkTK5-0001x7-Vy for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkTK4-0000I4-Bs for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:24:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:37751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkTK4-0000I0-0h for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:24:00 -0500 Original-Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so3487618eyh.0 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:23:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZClKD75k+Gj959wCRlriqYtU/mgQaSPZv2HpGOM9Cek=; b=E8LqSZ5r9h5trDK1xC7d2ZrIBOAz0AhUUx9FfzXgKhu8AUzi7qi0amgQnsQOV0i1wy BuZPPuwYHGljCW2C5niwyMI6cRD8t5cY3ywVKhCdT/arN9mp95VcPJaidhFSwog6Alti ZL6r7YAsbf1ZgTNpi5LL/tG0UcT6yDEKu109U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=K1W/yGvprKAqNujLFrbBCLm5yZvN8otzALSg4tqQxv3KNEuLKRZyzkUsaBjXJVn6pS R+PavHIzzI/YNtYVptEkDig5VE2pVX1/U8P+KvQ7F4ynxZX09IpTjM3tvVEzPTZBfB4V o+BACnFvFqr4Px8PHK1mzWA7BGaPVu4ig4Jzw= Original-Received: by 10.14.17.193 with SMTP id j41mr930940eej.38.1296617038358; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:23:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.14.119.11 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:23:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zkqi9lnl.fsf@escher.home> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:78928 Archived-At: --0016e65b40f6fb2ad3049b442d4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 filed bug http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7946 . This is the first Emacs bug I've filed in memory. Does anyone know what the timeline will be like? I'd like to give any additional details while I have it fresh in mind. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:59:07 +0800 Le Wang wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I discovered a weird issue with Emacs that I reproed with NTEmacs 23.2.1 > and > > CVS build from 20110112. > > > > I need someone to follow some of these steps to see if they can repro the > same > > thing on another platform before I file a bug report. You need the > > "rebox2.el" attached. > > > > 1 emacs -Q rebox2_bug.el > > > > 2 M-x eval-current-buffer > > > > 3 C-x b ;; switch to "*scratch*" > > > > 4 M-x rebox-mode > > > > 5 M-< > > > > 6 SPC,SPC ;; space twice > > > > 7 C-aC-aC-aC-a ;; notice that the point is stuck at 6 > > > > 8 C-xb ;; switch to "rebox2_bug.el > > > > 9 M-g g 1714 > > > > 10 C-d ;; uncomment the hack workaround the bug > > > > 11 C-M-x ;; reevaluated the function > > > > 12 C-x b ;; switch to "*scratch*" > > > > 13 C-aC-aC-aC-a ;; notice that the cursor switches between 1 and 6 > > > > So step 10 fixed the issue I was debugging with rebox2, however, it does > > nothing except refer to the marker "marked-point" in a format call. > > > > > > (format "%s" marked-point) > > > > > > How can this line change Emacs' behaviour? > > > > If you try the steps, please let me know if you can confirm my > observations. > > Thanks. > > I get the same behavior you observed on GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 > (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1) of 2011-01-13 on escher > > Steve Berman > > > -- Le --0016e65b40f6fb2ad3049b442d4d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable filed bug=A0http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D7946=A0. =A0This is the= first Emacs bug I've filed in memory. =A0Does anyone know what the tim= eline will be like? =A0I'd like to give any additional details while I = have it fresh in mind.

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Stephen Ber= man <stephen= .berman@gmx.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:59:07 +0800 Le Wang <l26wang@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> I discovered a weird issue with Emacs that I reproed with NTEmacs 23.2= .1 and
> CVS build from 20110112.
>
> I need someone to follow some of these steps to see if they can repro = the same
> thing on another platform before I file a bug report. =A0You need the<= br> > "rebox2.el" attached.
>
> 1 emacs -Q rebox2_bug.el
>
> 2 M-x eval-current-buffer
>
> 3 C-x b<enter> ;; switch to "*scratch*"
>
> 4 M-x rebox-mode
>
> 5 M-<
>
> 6 SPC,SPC ;; space twice
>
> 7 C-aC-aC-aC-a ;; notice that the point is stuck at 6
>
> 8 C-xb<enter> ;; switch to "rebox2_bug.el
>
> 9 M-g g 1714
>
> 10 C-d ;; uncomment the hack workaround the bug
>
> 11 C-M-x ;; reevaluated the function=A0
>
> 12 C-x b<enter> ;; switch to "*scratch*"
>
> 13 C-aC-aC-aC-a ;; notice that the cursor switches between 1 and 6
>
> So step 10 fixed the issue I was debugging with rebox2, however, it do= es
> nothing except refer to the marker "marked-point" in a forma= t call.
>
>
> =A0 =A0 (format "%s" marked-point)
>
>
> How can this line change Emacs' behaviour?
>
> If you try the steps, please let me know if you can confirm my observa= tions.
> =A0Thanks.

I get the same behavior you observed on GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1
(i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1) of 2011-01-13 on escher

Steve Berman





--
Le
--0016e65b40f6fb2ad3049b442d4d--