From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7244: `characterp' signals overflow-error Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:15:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287589368 12768 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2010 15:42:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 20 17:42:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8aoQ-0006Xx-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:42:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8aoQ-0006Ze-F4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39148 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8aoI-0006ZU-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8aoH-0006Wb-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8aoH-0006WX-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8aKg-0004tz-6D; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: MON KEY Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7244.128758751818836 (code B ref 7244); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2010 15:11:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8aKc-0004tl-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:11:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8aKb-0004td-9S for 7244@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so2615640ewy.3 for <7244@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.30.203 with SMTP id k53mr7292647wea.87.1287587745065; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.67.195 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:15:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: Iv5HjbU8dXqzilgc3s02t-7dM8s X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:12:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41010 Archived-At: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article , MON KEY writes: > >> (characterp 2536870911) signals overflow-error "2536870911") >> ;=> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (overflow-error "2536870911") > >> Why should this happen esp. when `max-char' sits just below the definition in >> src/character.c ?? > > The error is signaled by Lisp reader; i.e. before characterp > is executed. OK. I didn't realize this. This said, I am not understanding _where_ the overflow boundary is, e.g. following doesn't signal: most-positive-fixnum ;=> 536870911 (#o3777777777, #x1fffffff) (characterp 536870913) ;=> nil > Kenichi Handa -- /s_P\