From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:10:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbf795rv.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwur933c.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3pv92az.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290546703 1372 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 21:11:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:11:43 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs-Devel devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 22:11:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PL09G-0000Cy-Q4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:11:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39520 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL09G-0000yx-9S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56943 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL097-0000yq-Qv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PL092-0004dd-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:11:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:50745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PL092-0004dV-PI; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:11:20 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so6375124ewy.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ithQiLFYWaWf6ZqTokqxC84XfJoyY7/IWAHSUNZmfVI=; b=MkRJyVY+mOvFxE5mb/qHBVtHgqFP2JRhSJ/+nVkGakhoB7gf+mpJUVRgmgBJBV9Qx8 9AjLDD3kUuitVEOvwvXKM56qhXSUqqJotvX+LqLyOiFnp+2NPwmMYVUstFbJe7OcbgFY +AZa5Xd7NZdFDlA5BLjhqH8hyEfoJ0Ybbd7DM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fTfCNeu4As06AZE0/5JCZxe4qs5tsJ33frLApRNjTLcXOAZ/2mgZO/Ywm0Yha5CL2c DR6y+PNuf6h0ENOZXCARHAMAdtaYvbT5mFDVi8GoDhqsQ+asujuuS5513x+P9+k4LVoH 7QG6VZ6YlRrtAYrFIhUHHW6DIFcImg5JUdHIc= Original-Received: by 10.213.112.144 with SMTP id w16mr4389529ebp.84.1290546679731; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:11:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.34.199 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:10:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83d3pv92az.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133083 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:39 +0100 >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: Lennart Borgman >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100 >> >> Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >> >> >> > Because it's pointless. =C2=A0If we want to give users release b= inaries >> >> >> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period. >> >> >> >> >> >> Please explain why you think that. >> >> > >> >> > I just did, above. >> >> >> >> In what way is "pointless" an explanation? >> > >> > I meant the second sentence. >> >> Can you then explain if you think there is any reason not to ship the >> release binaries with debug info? > > I said it is slightly better, that's all. =C2=A0The reason is disk space, > of course: 30MB is a lot for a binary. Why do you then think it is pointless to ship both binaries with debug info and without it?